Skip to main content
Log in

The rise and fall of a non-Newtonian gravity experiment

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in 1987 in search for a possible non-Newtonian component to gravity. The test compared accurately measured gravity values on a 600 m tower with upward continued surface gravity. The results indicated a dominant attractive non-Newtonian force that asymptotically approached -540 µGal at the top of the tower. An exhaustive search of possible error sources led to the discovery that our surface data did not accurately represent some of the local topographic features. The surface survey was supplemented by gravity data to remove some of the biases that were caused by the misrepresentation. In addition, a rigorous terrain correction was applied to the surface data resulting in terrain-corrected Bouguer anomalies. These anomalies were then upward continued using two independent techniques. The terrain effect was added back to the predicted values at altitude. With this procedure almost the entire non-Newtonian effect was explained. Currently we find no conclusive evidence for a non-Newtonian force over the range of several hundred meters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelberger, E.G., C.W. Stubbs, W.F. Rodgers, F.J. Raab, B.R. Heckel, J.H. Gundlach, H.E. Swanson, and R. Watanebe, New constraints on composition-dependent interactions weaker than gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett., 59(8), 849–852, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ander, M.E., M.A. Zumberge, T. Lautzenhiser, R.L. Parker, C.L.V. Aiken, M.R. Gorman, M.M. Nieto, A.P.R. Cooper, J.F. Ferguson, E. Fisher, G.A. McMechan, G. Sasagawa, J.M. Stevenson, G. Backus, A.D. Chave, J. Greer, P. Hammer, B.L. Hansen, J.A. Hildebrand, J.R. Kelty, C. Sidles, and J. Wirtz, Test of Newton's inverse-square law in the Greenland ice cap,Phys. Rev. Lett., 62(9), 985–988, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, D.F. and W.L. Tew, Possible effect of the local terrain on the North Carolina tower gravity experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett., 63(14), 1531, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, P.W., D. Crosby, P. Ekstorm, and A. Szumilo, Search for an intermediate-range composition-dependent force,Phys. Rev. Lett., 59(13), 1385–1389, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, D.H., C. Jekeli, A.R. Lazarewicz, A.J. Romaides, and R.W. Sands, A tower gravity experiment: evidence for non-Newtonian gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett., 60(25),2567–2570, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, D.H., C. Jekeli, A.R. Lazarewicz, A.J. Romaides, and R.W. Sands, Detection of non-Newtonian gravity: The AFGL tower gravity experiment, inProceedings of the Fifth Marcel Grossman Meeting on General Relativity, edited by D. G. Blair and M. J. Buckingham, pp. 1565–1568, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1989a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, D.H., C. Jekeli, A.R. Lazarewicz, A.J. Romaides, and R.W. Sands, Evidence for non-Newtonian gravity: status of the AFGL experiment January 1989, inTest of Fundamental Laws of Physics, edited by O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van, pp.525–527, Editions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1989b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, R. and C.C. Tscheming, The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation,J. Geophys. Res., 86(B9), 7843–7584, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fougere, P. F., On the accur acy of spectrum analysis of red noise processes using maximum entropy and periodogram methods: simulation studies and application of geophysical data,J. Geophys. Res., 90(A5), 4355–4366, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, W.A., and H. Moritz,Physical Geodesy, Chapter 7, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, S.C., F.D. Stacey, and G.J. Tuck, Gravity in mines — an investigation of Newton's law”,Phys. Rev. D, 33(12), 3487–3494, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsui, A., Geophysical determination of the Newtonian gravitational constant based on a borehole gravity measurement,Science, 237, 881–883, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli, C., D.H. Eckhardt, and A.J. Romaides, Tower gravity experiment: no evidence for non-Newtonian gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett., 64(11),1204–1206, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.I., F.D. Stacey, G.J. Tuck, B.D. Goodwin, N.P. Linthome, M.A. Barton, D.M. Reid, and G.D. Agnew, Determination of the gravitational constant at an effective mass separation of 22 m,Phys. Rev. D, 38(4), 1023–1029, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R.H. and J.Y. Cruz, Spherical harmonic expansions of the earth's gravitational potential to degree 360 using 30′ mean anomalies,Report No. 376, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romaides, A.J. and C. Jekeli, Very accurate upward continuation to low heights in a test of non-Newtonian theory, inProceedings of the Chapman Conference on Progress in the Determination of the Earth's Gravity Field, Report No. 397, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, edited by R. H. Rapp, pp. 134–137, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romaides, A.J., C. Jekeli, A.R. Lazarewicz, D.H. Eckhardt, and R.W. Sands, A detection of non-Newtonian gravity,J. Geophys. Res., 94(B2), 1563–1572, 1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speake, C.C., T.M. Niebauer, M.P. McHugh, P.T. Keyser, J. Faller, J.Y. Cruz, J.C. Harrison, J. Mäkinen, and R.B. Beruff, “Test of the Inverse-Square Law of Gravitation Using the 300-m Tower at Erie, Colorado”,Phys. Rev. Lett., 65(16), 1967–1971,1990a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speake, C., J. Faller, J.Y. Cruz, and J.C. Harrison, "Validation of the Inverse Square Law of Gravitation Using the Tower at Erie, Colorado, U.S.A.," in Proceedings of the International Association of Geodesy, Symposium No. 103, Gravity, gradiometry, and Gravimetry, edited by R. Rummel and R.G. Hipkin, pp.17–30, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, F.D. and G.J. Tuck, Non-Newtonian gravity: geophysical evidence, inPrecision Measurement and Fundamental Constants II, B.N. Taylor and W.D. Phillips, eds., National Bureau of Standards, Special Publication no.617, pp.597–600, 1984.

  • Stubbs, C.W., E.G. Adelberger, F.J. Raab, J.H. Gundlach, B.R. Heckel, K.D. McMurry, H.E. Swanson, and R. Watanabe, Search for and intermediate-range interaction,Phys. Rev. Lett., 58(11), 1070–1073, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieberger, P., Search for a substance-dependent force with a new differential accelerometer,Phys. Rev. Lett., 58(11), 1066–1069, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., P. Kasameyer, O. Fackler, D. Felske, R. Harris, J. Kammeraad, M. Millet, and M. Mugge, Testing the inversesquare law of gravity on a 465-m tower,Phys. Rev. Lett., 63(18), 1902–1905, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romaides, A.J., Jekeli, C., Eckhardt, D.H. et al. The rise and fall of a non-Newtonian gravity experiment. Bulletin Géodésique 65, 230–242 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00807266

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00807266

Keywords

Navigation