Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of gravity gradients: a comparison study

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At different European institutes software has been developed for evaluation of the gravitational potential of the Earth using high degree spherical harmonic expansions. In this report the results of a comparison of a number of these software packages are presented. We compared the results for the second order derivatives (gravity gradients). It appeared that one of the most critical points in these computations is the definition of the coordinates, which should be as accurate as possible. Machine dependency and algorithm setup were of less importance, the former being only reflected in CPU timing results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

7 References

  • Balmino, G., Barriot, J.P., Valès, N. (1990) Nonsingular formulation of the gravity vector and gravity gradient tensor in spherical harmonics, Manuscripta Geodaetica 15: 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • CISI (1989) Study on precise gravity field determination methods and mission requirements, Final Report Phase A, ESA contract No. 7521/87/F/FL

  • Colombo, O.L. (1981) Numerical methods for harmonic analysis on the sphere, Dept. of Geod. Science, report no.310, Ohio State University, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornier (1988) ARISTOTELES Phase A study, Final Report, Estec contract No. 7528/88/NL/JS

  • Heiskanen, V., Moritz, H. (1967) Physical Geodesy, Freeman & Comp., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaula, W.M. (1966) Theory of satellite geodesy, Blaisdell Publ. Comp., Waltham, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, R., Stelpstra, D. (1989) On the computation of the gravitational potential and its first and second order derivatives, Manuscripta Geodaetica 14, 6: 373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S.H., Paik, H.J. (Eds.) (1988) Superconducting Gravity Gradiometer Mission, Vol.II: Study Team Technical Report, NASA Technical Memorandum 4091

  • Paul, M.K. (1978) Recurrence relations for integrals of associated Legendre functions, Bulletin Bulletin Géodésique 52: 177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thong, N.C., Grafarend, E.W. (1989) A spheroidal harmonic model of the terrestrial gravitational field, Manuscripta Geodaetica 14, 5: 285–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Thong, N.C. (1989) Simulation of gradiometry using the spheroidal harmonic model of the gravitational field, Manuscripta Geodaetica 14, 6: 404–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning, C.C. (1976) Computation of the second-order derivatives of the normal potential based on the representation by a Legendre series, Manuscripta Geodaetica 1: 71–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, M. (1989) FGI Studies on satellite gravity gradiometry. 1. Experiments with a 5-degree buried masses representation. Report 89:3 Finnish Geodetic Institute, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, M. (1990) Orbit integration with perturbing force interpolation from an OSU86F — based half — degree grid of geopotential partials, Manuscripta Geodaetica 15, 2: 83–96

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balmino, G., Barriot, J., Koop, R. et al. Simulation of gravity gradients: a comparison study. Bulletin Géodésique 65, 218–229 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00807265

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00807265

Keywords

Navigation