Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 355–363 | Cite as

The key role of water in the landscape system

Conceptualization to Address Growing Human Landscape Pressures
  • Falkenmark Malin 
  • Mikulski Zdzislaw 
Article
  • 124 Downloads

Abstract

The leading role of water and its interactions with other key environmental elements was well understood already in Antique time. Due to the later fragmentarization of science, this leading role seems to have become hidden, if not neglected. Today, both life-support systems and the productivity of land and water systems are increasingly threatened by human pressure, influencing water availability, water-related land productivity, water quality and productivity of aquatic ecosystems. The world may in fact be approaching or even overshooting its carrying capacity in certain regions, producing quite dangerous conditions. Basically, the anthropogenic influences from a rapidly growing world population with rising demands will produce a reshaped landscape with altered ways of functioning, and a growing water crowding.

Paying due attention to water phenomena and functions, this modified landscape has to be analyzed to identify the new strategies by which life support can be managed in the future. A conceptual base is urgently needed, addressing both natural and anthropogenic conditions and phenomena. In follow up of Agenda 21, the paper focuses on landscape analysis for the integration of land and water. It analyzes the main natural components of landscape systems and the ways in which the determinants are being influenced by human activities. A multitude of different interactions between land characteristics and water phenomena are identified. Due to the integrity of the water cycle, these interactions will have to be synthesized and integrated. When the natural funtions of a particular landscape are known, together with the anthropogenic pressure and the various influences from which it is composed, the landscape analysis in this paper may be useful in support of planning, projection and conceptualization of landscape management and spatial organization of land.

Keywords

Water Quality Water Cycle Anthropogenic Influence Anthropogenic Pressure Land Productivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Falkenmark, M.: The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa — Why isn't it being addressed? Ambio 18, 2, 112–118 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. Falkenmark, M.: Living at the mercy of the water cycle. Proceedings, Stockholm Water Symposium 1991. Stockholm Water LTD, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. Falkenmark, M.; Allard, B.: Water quality genesis and disturbances of natural freshwaters. pp. 45–78. In: Hutzinger, O. (ed.), The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Vol. 5, Part A: Water Pollution. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1989.Google Scholar
  4. Falkenmark, M.: Follow up of Agenda 21. Towards integration of land use and water management. Contribution to Stockholm Water Symposium 1993. Natural Resources Management Institute, Stockholm University. Report No. 1. 1993.Google Scholar
  5. Hägerstrand, T.: Landskapsmanteln. Input to a dialogue on “Understanding landscape changes”. Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research, Friiberghs Herrgård 8–9 October 1992. 1992.Google Scholar
  6. Hägerstrand, T.: Gränser — en försummad dimension i kritiskt tänkande. In: Sandström, U. (ed.), Det kritiska uppdraget. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science 94, University of Linköping (1993)Google Scholar
  7. Kjellén, B.: The UNCED process: Lessons to be drawn for the future. In: International Environmental Negotiations. Process, Issues and Context. Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research. FRN Report 93:1, 221–244. 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Naveh, Z.; Lieberman, A.: Landscape ecology. Theory and application. Springer Verlag, New York 1984.Google Scholar
  9. Richling, A.: Subject of Study in Complex Physical Geography (Landscape Geography). GeoJournal 7.2, 185–187 (1983)Google Scholar
  10. Richling, A.; Lewandowski, W.: The map of landscape use. Miscellanea Geographica, Warszawa 1988.Google Scholar
  11. Richling, A.: Systems of landscape classifications in Poland. Miscellanea Geographica, Warszawa 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Richling, A.: On methodology of assessment of aesthetic values of landscape. Miscellanea Geographica. Warszawa 1992.Google Scholar
  13. Stückelberger, A.: Einführung in die antiken Naturwissenschaften. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1988.Google Scholar
  14. University of Warszawa, European Institute of Regional and Local Development. Experience, activities, programmes. Warszawa 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Falkenmark Malin 
    • 1
  • Mikulski Zdzislaw 
    • 2
  1. 1.Naturvetenskapliga ForskningsrådetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Wydzial Geografii i Studiów RegionalnychUniwersytet WarszawskiWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations