Skip to main content
Log in

Pathways of penetration ofEscherichia coli 055 through the intestinal wall in germfree and ordinary animals

  • Pathological Physiology and General Pathology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Permeability of the intestinal barrier in germfree animals for bacteria of the enteropathogenic strainEscherichia coli 055 was studied. Germfree and ordinary rats and guinea pigs were used. During the first 24 h after peroral infection withE. coli 055 an increase in the bacteriemia was observed in the germfree animals, whereas in the ordinary animals the bacteriemia was transient in character. Electron-microscopic investigation of the intestinal mucosa of the germfree animals revealed disturbances of intercellular contacts and the formation of spaces containing numerous microorganisms between the enterocytes. In the germfree animals more marked changes also were found in the microvessels of the mucosa. In ordinary animals ingestion and digestion of theE. coli cells by enterocytes and leukocytes was observed. Disturbances of the intestinal barrier discovered in the germfree animals explain the increased bacteriemia in these animals in the absence of a microflora. The results point to the important role of the microbial factor in the formation of the intestinal barrier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. G. I. Podoprigora, Éksp. Khir., No. 5, 3 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. I. Podoprigora, Arkh. Patol., No. 3, 77 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. I. Podoprigora, in: The Use of Laboratory Animals in the Development, Production, and Control of Biological Medical Preparations (Proceedings of a Conference) [in Russian], Moscow (1976), p. 106.

  4. O. V. Chakhava, Gnotobiology [in Russian], Moscow (1972).

  5. G. Arrams, in: Germ-Free Biology. Experimental and Clinical Aspects, (ed. by E. Mirand and N. Back), Plenum Press New York (1969), p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Cox and M. Karnovsky, J. Cell Biol.,59, 480 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. D. Luckey, Germfree Life and Gnotobiology, Academic Press, New York (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Tripestad and T. Midvedt, Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand., Sect. B,79, 519 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Miller and G. I. Podoprigora, Folia Microbiol. (Prague),18, 319 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Policard, Inflammatory Responses and their Dynamics [Russian translation], Novosibirsk (1969).

  11. B. Reddy, B. Wostmann, and J. Pleasants, in: The Germ-Free Animal in Research (ed. by M. E. Coates), Academic Press, New York (1968), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Staley, E. Jones, and L. Corley, in: Germ-Free Biology. Experimental and Clinical Aspects (ed. by E. Mirand and N. Back), Plenum Press, New York (1969), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Wagner, Ann. New York Acad. Sci.,78, 89 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Tomogane, K. Ota, and A. Yokoyama, J. Endocrinol.,44, 101 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. A. Tucker, M. J. Paape, and J. M. Sinha, Am. J. Physiol.,213, 262 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chernukh, A.M., Podoprigora, G.I. & Kranchev, A.K. Pathways of penetration ofEscherichia coli 055 through the intestinal wall in germfree and ordinary animals. Bull Exp Biol Med 85, 714–717 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806144

Key Words

Navigation