Soviet Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 37–40 | Cite as

Theory and technique of manufacture of electrode-tool materials for electroerosion machining

6. Electrical erosion of carbides of the transition metals
  • G. V. Samsonov
  • I. M. Mukha
  • L. V. Globa
Powder Metallurgical Materials, Parts, and Coatings
  • 16 Downloads

Conclusions

In the electrospark machining of carbides of the transition metals, the character and extent of their erosion depend on the form and energy of the discharge pulses and also on the nature and relative strengths of the Me-C and Me-Me chemical bonds. With increase in electrical pulse energy, the explosive action on the electrodes becomes more intense, as a result of which the carbides suffer greater attack through melting, evaporation, and mechanical disruption.

The nature and relative strengths of the chemical bonds in the carbide lattices determine which mechanism of erosion predominates in the process. With strong Me-C bonds, characteristic of the Group IV metal carbides, electroerosion is mainly due to a mechanism of brittle mechanical disintegration. In the Group V metal carbides, this mechanism is less pronounced, and there is a corresponding increase in erosion due to evaporation and melting. The evaporation and melting mechanism is chiefly responsible for the erosion of the Group VI metal carbides.

In the ion bombardment of carbides of the transition metals in a glow discharge, where explosive and hydrodynamic actions are largely suppressed, no cleavage-type mechanical disruption is observed, and the erosion resistance of the carbides depends on their electronic structure and energetic state. Thus, with increase in the SWASC sp3, the erosion resistance of carbides of the transition metals grows.

Keywords

Carbide Explosive Erosion Resistance Mechanical Disruption Metal Carbide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    I. M. Mukha, L. V. Globa, and V. A. Gorbatyuk, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 3 (1967).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. V. Samsonov and I. M. Mukha, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 7 (1968).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. V. Samsonov, I. M. Mukha, and L. V. Globa, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 9 (1968).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. V. Samsonov, I. M. Mukha, and L. V. Globa, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 1 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. V. Samsonov, in: Refractory Carbides, Consultants Bureau, New York (in press).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. V. Samsonov and A. D. Verkhoturov, Élektronnaya Obrabotka Material., No. 2 (1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. V. Samsonov
    • 1
  • I. M. Mukha
    • 1
  • L. V. Globa
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiopribor FactoryKiev

Personalised recommendations