Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative analysis of plastic activity of muscle and nerve tissues after trauma and transplantation of minced muscle

  • Morphology and Pathomorphology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Repair processes in the body muscle ofVaricorhinus capoëta sevangi were studied after removal of part of three muscle segments and after autografting the resulting defect with minced muscle. As a result of trauma a focus of injury developed in the muscle, including the defect and the surrounding zone of degeneration. The inflammatory reaction, resorption of the necrotic masses, and regeneration of the muscle and nerve tissue continued for a long time. The formation of myogenic components did not begin until the 3rd week and single regenerating nerve fibers appeared in the region of injury after 2 months. Filling the defect with minced muscle accelerated regeneration. The transplanted fragments of muscle fibers not only participated themselves in the repair process but also stimulated the plastic activity of the muscle and nerve tissues of the graft bed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. A. A. Zavarzin, Arkh. Anat.,19, No. 3, 353 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Klishov, Trudy Kuibyshev. Med. Inst.,67, 36 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. M. Kulagin, Abstracts of Proceedings of the 30th Scientific Session of Kuibyshev Medical Institute [in Russian], Kuibyshev (1972), pp. 196–197.

  4. L. D. Liozner, Basic Problems in the Study of Regeneration [in Russian], Moscow (1975).

  5. G. M. Litver, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,73, 817 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. S. Sarkisov, Regeneration and Its Clinical Importance [in Russian], Moscow (1970).

  7. V. F. Sidorova, Age and Regenerative Power of the Organs in Mammals [in Russian], Moscow (1976).

  8. A. N. Studitskii, Experimental Surgery of Muscles [in Russian], Moscow (1959).

  9. A. N. Studitskii, Enigmas of Morphogenesis [in Russian], Moscow (1977).

  10. A. N. Studitskii and Z. P. Ignat'eva, Regeneration of Muscles in Higher Mammals [in Russian], Moscow (1961).

  11. V. I. Kheisina, in: Recollections of Academician A. A. Zavarzin [in Russian], Moscow-Leningrad (1948), pp. 147–162.

  12. B. A. Chentsov, Trudy Akad. Med. Nauk SSSR,3, 208 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. M. Carlson, The Regeneration of Minced Muscles, Basel (1972).

  14. R. J. Goss, Principles of Regeneration, New York (1969).

Download references

Authors
  1. R. P. Zhenevskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. Ovsepyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. M. Umnova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. A. Melikyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhenevskaya, R.P., Ovsepyan, A.A., Umnova, M.M. et al. Comparative analysis of plastic activity of muscle and nerve tissues after trauma and transplantation of minced muscle. Bull Exp Biol Med 85, 404–407 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801372

Key Words

Search

Navigation