Skip to main content

Dipyridamole thallium-201 single-photon emission tomography in aortic stenosis: gender differences

Abstract

Dipyridamole single-photon emission tomography (SPET) is used for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the method has also been applied in patients with aortic stenosis. This study was undertaken to establish the gender-specific normal limits of thallium-201 distribution in patients with aortic stenosis and to apply these normal limits in a larger group of patiens with aortic stenosis to obtain the sensitivity and specificity for coexisting CAD. A low-dose dipyridamole protocol was used (0.56 mg/kg during 4 min). Thallium was injected 2 min later and tomographic imaging was performed. Following image reconstruction a basal, a mid-ventricular and an apical short-axis slice were selected. The highest activity in each 6° segment was normalised to the maximal acitivity of each slice. The normal uptake for patients with aortic stenosis was obtained from ten men and ten women with aortic stenosis and a normal coronary angiography. Eighty-nine patients were prospectively evaluated. An area reduction of at least 75% in a coronary artery was considered to be a significant coronary lesion and was found in 57 (64%) patients. With gender-specific curves (-2.5 SD) sensitivity for detecting CAD was 100% and specificity was 75% in men, while sensitivity was 61% and specificity 64% in women. It is concluded that the gender-specific normal distribution of201T1 uptake in patients with aortic stenosis, using dipyridamole SPET, yields a high sensitivity and specificity for coronary artery lesions in men but a lower sensitivity and specificity in women with aortic stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Skjærpe T, Hegrenæs L, Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography.Circulation 1985; 72: 810–818.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karp K, Teien D, Eriksson P. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the valve area in patients with atrioventricular valve stenosis by application of the continuity equation.J Intern Med 1989; 225: 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith MD, Grayburn PA, Spain MG, DeMaria AN, Kwan OL, Moffett CB. Observer variability in the quantification of Doppler color flow jet areas for mitral and aortic regurgitation.J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 579–584.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pantely GA. Interaction of coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease. In: Greenberg B, Murphy E ed.Valvular heart disease. Littleton: PSG; 1987: 192–203.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paquay PA, Anderson G, Diefenthal H, Nordstrom L, Richman HG, Gobel FL. Chest pain as predictor of coronary artery disease in patients with obstructive aortic valve disease.Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 863–869.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fintel DJ, Links JM, Brinker JA, Frank TL, Parker M, Becker LC. Improved diagnostic performance of exercise thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography over planar imaging in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 600–612.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey IK, Come PC, Kelly DT, Burow RD, Griffith LS, Strauss HW, Pitt B. Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging in aortic valve stenosis.Am J Cardiol 1977; 40: 889–899.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pfisterer M, Müller-Brand J, Bründler H, Cueni T. Prevalence and significance of reversible radionuclide ischemic perfusion defects in symptomatic aortic valve disease patients with or without concomitant coronary disease.Am Heart J 1982; 103: 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huikuri HV, Korhonen UR, Heikkilä J, Takkunen JT. Detection of coronary artery disease by thallium scintigraphy in patients with valvar heart disease.Br Heart J 1986; 56: 146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kupari M, Virtanen KS, Turto H, Viitasalo M, Manttari M, Lindroos M, Koskela E, Leinonen H, Pohjola-Sintonen S, Heilk-kila J. Exclusion of coronary artery disease by exercise thallium-201 tomography in patients with aortic valve stenosis.Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 625–640.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gould KL. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacological coronary vasodilatation. 1. Physiologic basis and experimental validation.Am J Cardiol 1978; 41: 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gould KL, Westcott RJ, Albro PC, Hamilton GW. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacological coronary vasodilatation. II. Clinical methodology and feasibility.Am J Cardiol 1978; 41: 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stratman HG, Kennedy HL. Evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients unable to exercise: alternatives to exercise stress testing.Am Heart J 1989; 117: 1344–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iskandrian AS, Jaekyeong H, Askenase H, Sega BL, Auerbach N. Dipyridamole cardiac imaging.Am Heart J 1988; 115: 432–443.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huikuri HV Korhonen UR, Ikäheimo MJ, Heikkilä J, Takkunen JT. Detection of coronary artery disease by thallium imaging using a combined intravenous dipyridamole and isometric handgrip test in patients with aortic valve stenosis.Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 336–340.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aubry P, Assayag P, Faraggi M, Haddad A, Akesbi A, Messian O, Brochet E, Bok B, Valère PE. Dètection d'une maladic coronarienne avant chirurgie valvularie.Ann Cardiol Angéiol 1991; 40: 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rask P, Karp K, Edlund B, Eriksson P, Mooe T, Wiklund U. Computer-assisted evaluation of dipyridamole thallium-201 SPECT in patients with aortic stenosis.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 983–988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Francisco DA, Collins SM, Go RT, Ehrhardt JC, Van Kirk OC, Marcus ML. Tomographic thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigrams after maximal coronary artery vasodilatation with intravenous dipyridamole.Circulation 1982; 66: 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Troy BL, Pombo J, Rackley CE. Measurements of left ventricular wall thickness and mass by echocardiography.Circulation 1972; 45: 602–611.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Levy D, Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Echocardiographc criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study.Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 956–960.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Younis LT, Chairman BR. Update in intravenous dipyridamole cardiac imaging in the assessment of ischemic heart disease.Clin Cardiol 1990; 13: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Borg G, Linderholm H. Exercise performance and perceived exertion in patients with coronary insufficiency, arterial hypertension and vasoregulatory asthenia.Acta Med Scand 1970; 187: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Greenberg B, Massie B. Beneficial effects of afterload reduction therapy in patients with congestive heart failure and moderate aortic stenosis.Circulation 1980: 61: 1212–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ikram H, Low C, Crozier I, Shirlaw T. Hemodynamic effects of nitroprusside on valvular aortic stenosis.Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshikawa J, Akasaka T, Yoshida K, Takagi T. Systolic coronary flow reversal and abnormal diastolic flow patterns in patients with aortic stenosis: assessment with an intracoronary Doppler catheter.J Am Soc Echo 1993; 6: 516–524.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hongo M, Goto T, Watanabe N, Nakatsuka T, Tanaka M, Kinoshita O, Yamada H, Okubo S, Sekiguchi M. Relation of phasic coronary flow velocity profile to clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of patients with aortic valve disease.Circulation 1993; 88: 953–960.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Houghton JL, Prisant LM, Carr AA, von Dohlen TW, Frank MJ. Relationship of left ventricular mass to impairment of coronary vasodilator reserve in hypertensive heart disease.Am Heart J 1991; 1212: 1107–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  28. DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts.J Nucl Med 1989; 30: 441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  29. DeRouren T, Murray J, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.Circulation 1977; 5: 324–328.

    Google Scholar 

  30. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML. Does visual interpretation of the coronary angiogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?N Engl J Med 1984: 310: 819–824.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Czer LS, Gray RJ, Stewart ME, DeRobertis M, Chaux A, Matloff JM. Reduction in sudden late death by concomitant revascularization with aortic valve replacement.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 95: 390–401.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jones M, Schofield PM, Brooks NH, Dark JF, Moussalli H, Deiraniy AK, Lawson RAM, Rahman AN. Aortic valve replacement with combined myocardial revascularisation.Br Heart J 1989; 62: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rask, L.P., Karp, K.H., Eriksson, N.P. et al. Dipyridamole thallium-201 single-photon emission tomography in aortic stenosis: gender differences. Eur J Nucl Med 22, 1155–1162 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800598

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800598

Key words

  • Aortic stenosis
  • Thallium-201
  • Singlephoton emission tomography
  • Gender differences
  • Computer evaluation