Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of feeding on electrical activity of the duodenal smooth muscles in dogs

  • Physiology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Electrical activity of the duodenal smooth muscles was studied with the aid of permanently implanted electrodes. This activity was compared in the fasting state and at a time after feeding equal to the duration of the resting period and the period of activity of the duodenum outside digestion. Duodenal activity after feeding, as reflected in the number of pace-setting potentials, corresponded to its fasting activity. Duodenal activity during digestion differed considerably as regards the number of spike volleys outside digestion. The ratio between “digestive” and ‘fasting” duodenal electrical activity depended on the type of potentials and the periods of time compared. The optimal nature of “digestive” activity of the duodenal smooth muscles is evidently reflected in the fact that this activity fluctuates within certain limits during digestion: between maximal activity during the period of work and minimal activity during the period of rest outside digestion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. S. V. Anickhov, Nervol. Vestinik (Kazan'),21, No. 3, 861 (1914).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. P. Ashmarin, N. N. Vasil'ev, and V. A. Ambrosov, Rapid Methods of Statistical Analysis and Planning of Experiments [in Russian], Leningrad (1975).

  3. V. N. Boldyrev, Bol'nichnaya Gazeta Botkina, No. 34, 1529 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. N. Lebedev, Physiology and Pathology of Periodic Activity of the Digestive Tract [in Russian], Moscow (1967).

  5. A. P. Mukhina, “Duodenal motor activity under normal and pathological conditions”, Author's Abstract of Candidate's Dissertation, Moscow (1966).

  6. V. N. Ustinov and V. I. Kotel'nikova, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR, No. 2, 284 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. N. Ustinov, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR, No. 6, 961 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. L. Allen, E. W. Poole, and C. F. Code, Am. J. Physiol.,207, 906 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Bass, in: Handbook of Physiology, Alimentary Canal, Vol. IV, Washington (1968), p. 2051.

  10. E. J. McCoy and K. D. Baker, Am. J. Physiol.,214, 1291 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. J. McCoy and P. Bass, Am. J. Physiol.,205, 439 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. H. Szurszewski, Am. J. Physiol.,217, 1757 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. W. Weisbrodt, Int. Rev. Sci. Physiol. Ser.,4, 157 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shemerovskii, K.A. Effect of feeding on electrical activity of the duodenal smooth muscles in dogs. Bull Exp Biol Med 86, 1274–1277 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800433

Key Words

Navigation