Skip to main content
Log in

The species specificity of organ regeneration of skeletal muscles in mammals

  • Experimental Biology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Summary

The capacity for organ regeneration was studied in 12 dogs on m. gastrocnemius. In the first experimental series on 3 adult dogs and 3 puppies, m. gastrocnemius was excised with retention of the stumps of the head ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 cm in size, while flexor digitorum sublimis was excised completely. In the second series of experiments, staged on the same number of dogs, minced muscular tissue was placed into the bed of the removed muscles. Followup observations ranged from 5 to 12 months. No regeneration of gastrocnemius occurred either in the first or in the second series of experiments. Tendo Achillis regenerated, up to the stumps, and adhered to them and the surrounding muscles.

Thus, no organ regeneration was observed in dog gastrocnemius, as distinct from rats [10, 12]. This points to the species differences in the capacity of the muscles of various mammals for regeneration. These differences should be taken into consideration so as not to overestimate this capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. G. N. Voronin, Arkh. Anat., 2, 18 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Vorontsova, The Regeneration of Organs in Animals [in Russian], Moscow, 1949.

  3. M. A. Vorontsova, Regeneration of Lost Organs in Mammals and Man [in Russian], 1953.

  4. M. A. Vorontsova and L. D. Liozner, Physiological Regeneration [in Russian], Moscow, 1955.

  5. M. A. Vorontsova and L. D. Liozner, Asexual Reproduction and Regeneration [in Russian], Moscow, 1957.

  6. M. A. Vorontsova, In: Processes of Regeneration and Cell Proliferation in Animals [in Russian], p. 7, Moscow, 1961.

  7. A. F. Klimov, Anatomy of Domestic Animals [in Russian], vol. 1, Moscow, 1955.

  8. L. D. Liozner, Arkh. Anat., 8, 3 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. M. Litver and N. N. Dampel', Arkh. anat., 9, 54 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. M. Litver, N. N. Dampel', I. B. Simel'son, et al., Byull. éksper. biol., 8, 101 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. N. Rumyantseva, The Plastic Properties of Skeletal Muscle Tissue [in Russian], Moscow, 1960.

  12. A. N. Studitskii, The Experimental Surgery of Muscles [in Russian], Moscow, 1959.

  13. A. N. Studitskii and Z. P. Ignat'eva, Regeneration of Muscles in the Higher Mammals [in Russian], Moscow, 1961.

  14. E. Klika and M. Doskocil, Csl. Morfol., 1956, v. 4, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Idem, Ibid., 1956, v. 4, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Puza, Ibid., 1958, v. 6, p. 414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Litver, G.M., Penteshina, N.A. The species specificity of organ regeneration of skeletal muscles in mammals. Bull Exp Biol Med 55, 79–83 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800208

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800208

Keywords

Navigation