Abstract
Object relations theory has been dominated by the concept of the mother as the primary and most influential object in infancy. New considerations of the role of the father are questioning this premise and raising issues about the influence of multi-object relationships in very early life. Illustrations are drawn from different cultures with a wide variety of child rearing practices. Implications for theory, assessment, and treatment are illustrated through case material.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelin, E.L. (1980). Triangulation, the role of the father and the origins of core gender identity during the rapprochement subphase. In R.F. Lax, S. Bach, and J.S. Burland (Eds.)Rapprochement: The Critical Subphase of Separation-Individuation. New York: Jason Aronson.
Blos, P. (1983). The contribution of psychoanalysis to the psychotherapy of adolescents.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 38:557–600.
Cheek, F.E. (1970). The schizophrenogenic mother in word and deed. In N. Ackerman (Ed.)Family Process. New York: Basic Books.
Chesler, P. (1972).Women and Madness. New York: Doubleday and Co.
Chisholm, J.S. (1980). Development and adaptation in infancy. In C.M. Super and S. Harkness (Eds.)Anthropological Perspectives on Child Development. New Directions for Child Development, No. 8. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Colonna, A.B. and Newman, L.M. (1983). The psychoanalytic literature on siblings.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 38 285–310.
Dorpat, T.L. (1981). Basic concepts and terms in object regulations theories. In S. Tuttman C. Kaye, and M. Zimmerman (Eds.)Object and self: a developmental approach, New York: International Universities Press.
Erikson, E. (1963).Childhood and Society (2nd edition). New York: W.W. Norton.
Harkness, S. (1980). The cultural context of child development. In C.M. Super and S. Harkness (Eds.)Anthropological Perspectives on Child Development. New Directions for Child Development. No. 8, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hartmann, H. (1952). The mutual influences in the development of ego and id.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 7:9–30.
Heilbrun, A.B. (1973).Aversive Maternal Control: A Theory of Schizophrenic Development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Janeway, E. (1971).Man's World, Women's Place: A Study in Social Mythology. New York: William Morrow and Co. Inc.
Kris, M. and Ritvo, S. (1983). Parents and siblings. Their mutual influences.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 38:311–324.
LeVine, R.A. (1980). Anthropology and child development. In C.M. Super and S. Harkness (Eds.)Anthropological Perspectives on Child Development. New Directions for Child Development, no. 8, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mahler, M.S., Pine, F. and Bergman, A. (1975).Psychological Birth of the Human Infant. New York: Basic Books.
Mahler, M. (1979). Notes on the development of basic moods: the depressive affect. InSelected Papers of Margaret S. Mahler. New York: Jason Aronson, Vol II.
Naylor, A.K. (1980). Early intervention: panacea or challenge? Characteristics of parents in a mental health clinic for young children. In E.J. Anthony and C. Chiland (Eds.)The Child in His Family: Preventive Child Psychiatry in An Age of Transition. Vol 6. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Neubauer, P.B. (1983). The importance of the sibling experience.Psychanalytic Study of the Child, 38:325–336.
Provence, S. and Naylor, A. (1983).Working with Disadvantaged Parents and Their Children. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Pruett, K.D. (1983). Infants of primary nurturing fathers.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 38:257–277.
Rapaport, D. (1967). The study of Kibbutz education and its bearing on the theory of development. InThe Collected Papers of David Papaport. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Ross, J.M. (1982). In search of fathering: a review. In S.A. Cath, A.R. Gurwitt and J.M. Ross (Eds.)Father and Child: Developmental and Clinical Perspectives. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Seidenberg, R. (1978). Psychoanalysis and the feminist movement. In M.C. Nelson and I. Ikenberry (Eds.)Psychosexual Imperatives. New York: Human Sciences, Press.
Solnit, A.J. Foreword. (1983). In S. Provence and A. Naylor.Working with Disadvantaged Parents and Their Children. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Spitz, R.A. (1968).First Year of Life. New York: International Universities Press.
Super, C.M. and Harkness, S. (1982). The development of affect in infancy and early childhood. In D.A. Wagner and H.W. Stevenson (Eds.).Cultural Perspectives in Child Development. San Francisco: S.W. Fremont and Co.
Winnicott, D.W. (1965).The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
in private practice. This article is a revised version of an address to The New Jersey Society for Clinical Social Work, May 22, 1983.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lieberman, F. Singular and plural objects: Thoughts on object relations theory. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 1, 153–167 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00798431
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00798431