Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of structural factors on the mechanical properties of superhard materials based on boron nitride

  • Test Methods and Properties of Materials
  • Published:
Soviet Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics Aims and scope

Conclusions

With increasing grain size a transition takes place from intercrystallite to dual-type (inter- and transcrystallite) fracture. The two-phase Geksanit-R is characterised by the smallest grain size, a uniform grain size, and the lowest inclusion and pore contents. It is to these characteristics that the material owes its high hardness and excellent fracture toughness (Kc≈50–55 kgf/mm3/2); its effective energy of fracture, y ≈ (6.2–7.5)·104 ergs/cm4, is an order greater than its true surface enrgy γo. The hardness of Geksanit-R sinterings is virtually independent of the ratio between the relative amounts of BNw and BNs. The presence in Geksanit-R specimens of 2–7% of graphitelike boron nitride embrittles the material, without substantially altering its hardness. The other BNs-base superhard materials (including Elber-R, Belbor, and PTNB-IB-1) are less hard than Geksanit-R, which is attributable to their larger grain size and the presence of foreign substances and phases, and exhibit a marked tendency toward brittle rupture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. E. S. Bogorodskii, Yu. L. Aparnikov, and B. M. Sokolovskii, “Dependence of the useful life of a tool from polycrystalline cubic boron nitride on its physicochemical properties in the cutting of difficult-to-machine materials,” Almazy Sverkhtverdye Mater., No. 5, 6–9 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. F. Semko, V. P. Zubar', G. G. Karyuk, et al., “Operating performance of Geksanit-R tools in the lathe-machining of quenched steels and heat-resisting alloys,” in: Geksanit and Geksanit-R and Tools Made of Them [in Russian], Kiev (1974), pp. 50–56.

  3. A. G. Evans and T. R. Wilshaw, “Quasistatic solid particle damage in brittle solids. I. Observations, analysis and implications,” Acta Metall.,24, 939–956 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. G. Evans and E. A. Charles, “Fracture toughness determinations by indentation,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,59, No. 7–8, 371–372 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. A. Borisenko, A. K. Butylenko, O. N. Grigor'ev, Yu. V. Mil'man, and V. I. Trefilov, “Effect of temperature and high pressure on the mechanical properties of diamond,” in: Synthetic Diamonds — a Key to Technical Progress [in Russian], Part 1, Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1977), pp. 330–337.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. N. Grigor'ev, Yu. V. Mil'man, V. N. Skvortsov, et al., “Resistance of covalent crystals to microindentation,” Poroshk. Metall., No. 8, 72–80 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Bochko, O. N. Grigor'ev, S. S. Dzhamarov, et al., “Temperature dependence of the hardness of boron nitride,” Poroshk. Metall., No. 6, 64–69 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fed. Ger. Rep. Pat. No. 2111180 (1972).

  9. Franch Pat. No. 2098009, June 23, 1977.

  10. Fed. Ger. Rep. Pat. No. 2235240 (1972).

  11. U.S. Pat. No. 3876751, Apr. 8, 1975.

  12. E. F. Dolgopol'skaya et al., “Dependence of the strength of synthetic diamonds on their density,” Summaries of Papers to an All-Union Conference on New Developments in the Theory and Practice of Production and Application of Synthetic Superhard Materials in the National Economy [in Russian], Kiev (1977).

  13. A. G. Evans, “Energies for crack propagation in polycrystalline MgO,” Phil. Mag.,22, No. 178, 841–852 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. F. Nott, Principles of Fracture Mechanics [Russian translation], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. J. Stokes, “Microscopic aspects of the fracture of ceramics,” in: Fracture [Russian translation], Vol. 7, Mir, Moscow (1976), pp. 119–220.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. K. Gupta, “A qualitative model for the development of tough ceramics,” J. Mater. Sci.,9, No. 10, 1585–1589 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Hubner and W. Strobl, “Anwendbarkeit bruchmechanischer Verfahren auf keramische Werkstoffe,” Ber. Deut. Keram. Ges.,54, No. 12, 401–404 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Poroshkovaya Metallurgiya, No. 10(202), pp. 61–69, October, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bochko, A.V., Grigor'ev, O.N., Dzhamarov, S.S. et al. Effect of structural factors on the mechanical properties of superhard materials based on boron nitride. Powder Metall Met Ceram 18, 729–736 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00797446

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00797446

Keywords

Navigation