Brohet CR, Derwael-Barchy C, Robert A, et al. (1983) Computer interpretation of pediatric Frank vectorcardiograms in the evaluation of congenital heart disease.Am J Cardiol 52:127–132
Google Scholar
Brohet CR, Hoeven C, Robert A, Derwael C, Fesler R, Brasseur LA (1986) The normal pediatric Frank orthogonal electrocardiogram: variations according to age and sex.J Electrocardiol 19:1–14
Google Scholar
Brohet CR (1990) Special value of the vectorcardiogram in pediatric cardiology.J Electrocardiol 23 (suppl):58–62
Google Scholar
Chou TC (1986) When is the vectorcardiogram superior to the scalar electrocardiogram?J Am Coll Cardiol 8:791–799
Google Scholar
Dower GE, Machado HB, Osborne JA (1980) On deriving the electrocardiogram from vectorcardiographic leads.Clin Cardiol 3:87–95
Google Scholar
Edenbrandt L, Pahlm O (1988) Vectorcardiogram synthesized from a 12-lead ECG: superiority of the inverse Dower matrix.J Electrocardiol 21:361–367
Google Scholar
Edenbrandt L, Pahlm O, Lyttkens K, Albrechtsson U (1990) Improved ECG interpretation using synthesized VCG for the diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction.J Electrocardiol 23:207–211
Google Scholar
Francis DB, Miller BL, Benson DW Jr (1981) A new computer program for analysis of pediatric scalar electrocardiograms.Comput Biomed Res 14:63–77
Google Scholar
Frank E (1954) The image surface of a homogeneous torso.Am Heart J. 47:757–768
Google Scholar
Frank E (1956) An accurate, clinically practical system for spatial vectorcardiography.Circulation 13:737–749
Google Scholar
Garson A (1987) Clinically significant differences between the “old” analog and the “new” digital electrocardiograms.Am Heart J 114:194–197
Google Scholar
Kors JA, van Herpen G, Sittig AC, van Bemmel JH (1990) Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: diagnostic comparison of different methods.Eur Heart J 11:1083–1092
Google Scholar
Liebman J (1989) Electrocardiography in congenital heart disease. In: Macfarlane PW, Lawrie TDV (eds)Comprehensive electrocardiology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 729–798
Google Scholar
Macfarlane PW, Coleman EN, Pomphrey EO, McLaughlin S, Houston A, Aitchison TC (1989) Normal limits of the high-fidelity pediatric ECG.J Electrocardiol 22 (suppl): 162–168
Google Scholar
Macfarlane PW, Coleman EN, Devine B, et al. (1990) A new 12-lead pediatric ECG interpretation program.J Electrocardiol 23 (suppl):76–81
Google Scholar
Macfalane PW, Devine B, Latif S, McLaughlin S, Shoat DB, Watts MP (1990) Methodology of ECG interpretation in the Glasgow program.Method Inform Med 29:354–361
Google Scholar
Perry LW, Pipberger HV, Pipberger HA, McManus CD, Scott LP (1986) Scalar, planar, and spatial measurements of the Frank vectorcardiogram in normal infants and children.Am Heart J 111:721–730
Google Scholar
Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, et al. (1991). The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.N Engl J Med 325:1767–1773
Google Scholar
Willems JL, Poblete PF, Pipberger HV (1972). Day-to-day variation of the normal orthogonal electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.Circulation 45:1057–1064
Google Scholar
Zywietz C, Klusmeier S, Bernsau U (1977) New VCG analysis program for children with multivariate diagnostic classification. In: Ostrow HG, Ripley KL (eds) IEEE Computer Society, proc Comp in Cardiology, pp 95–100