Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Statistical methods for measuring outcomes

  • Review
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This issue of the journal concerns promotion of the routine use of outcome measures in clinical practice; the purpose of this particular article, however, is to warn care providers to thinkvery very carefully before routinely using such measures. Just what are the benefits of their use? What are the outcome measures intended to demonstrate? In order to try to convince the reader that there might be real difficulties in the interpretation of the results, the main body of the paper concentrates on the difficulties in the interpretation of data from a structured research project that has been specifically designed to evaluate an innovation in mental health care provision. The difficulties of interpreting haphazardly collected data as part of routine clinical or administrative practice will be far greater. One of the main purposes of an evaluative exercise is comparison: which approach to service provision is the better? If care providers really want to be involved in mental health service evaluation then their time would be much better spent in taking part in a large multicentre trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buck C, Donner A (1982) The design of controlled experiments in the evaluation of non-therapeutic interventions. J Chronic Dis 35: 531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1983) Planning and analysis of observational studies. Wiley, Chichester New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett D (1991) Modelling binary data. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook TD, Campbell TD (1979) Quasi-experimentation: design and analysiss issues for field settings. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornfield J (1978) Randomization by group: a formal analysis. Am J Epidemiol 108: 100–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Day SJ, Graham DF (1991) Sample size estimation for comparing two or more treatment groups in clinical trials. Stat Med 10: 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner A, Klar N (1993) Confidence interval construction for effect measures arising from cluster randomization trials. J Clin Epidemiol 46: 123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner A, Brown KS, Brasher P (1990) A methodological review of non-therapeutic intervention trials employing cluster randomzation, 1979–1989. Int J Epidemiol 19: 795–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy SW, South MC, Day NE (1992) Cluster randomization in large public health trials: the importance of antecedent data. Stat Med 11: 307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn G (1989) Design and analysis of reliability studies: the statistical evaluation of measurement errors. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn G (1992) Design and analysis of reliability studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1: 123–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss JL (1987) Design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, Chichester New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner MJ, Altman DG (1989) Statistics with confidence. BMJ, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H (1987) Multilevel models in educational and social research. Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood RJ, McMillan TM, Brooks DN, Dunn G, Brock D, Dinsdale S, Murphy LD, Price JR (1994) An investigation into the effects of case management after severe head injury. BMJ 308: 1199–1205

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AB (1955) Introduction to medical statistics, 5th edn. (Monograph) Lancet London

  • Hsieh FY (1988) Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomization. Stat Med 8: 1195–1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication in the design of ecological field experiments Ecol Monogr 54: 187–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AL (1989) Methodology of clinical trials in psychiatry In: Freeman C, Tyrer P (eds) Research methods in psychiatry. Royal College of Psychiatrists. London, pp 12–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachin JM (1981) Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 2: 93–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1992) The design and analysis of research studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock S (1983) Clinical trials: a practical approach. Wiley, Winchester New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley MJ, Smith PG, Dramaix M (1989) Calculation of power for matched pair studies when randomization is by group. Int J Epidemiol 18: 457–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer WO, Feinstein AR, Sackett DL (1975) What is a health care trial? J Am Med Assoc 233: 161–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner DL, Norman GR (1989) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright JG, Feinstein AR (1992) A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales. J Clin Epidemiol 45: 1201–1218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF, London, UK

    G. Dunn

Authors
  1. G. Dunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunn, G. Statistical methods for measuring outcomes. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 29, 198–204 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00796377

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00796377

Keywords

Search

Navigation