Skip to main content
Log in

α-Adrenergic responses of isolated canine coronary microvessels

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Basic Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although α-adrenergic activation is known to increase coronary microvascular resistance in vivo, the magnitude of its segmental microvascular consequences is not well understood. Quantification of these effects in vivo is hindered by escape mechanisms that minimize the influences of constrictors, and alterations in flow and pressure, which effect microvascular tone by shear stress-dependent and myogenic mechanisms, respectively. To eliminate these confounding influences, we have studied responses in vitro under conditions with these variables controlled. We evaluated the diameter changes of isolated canine coronary arterioles (110±12 μm, n=35) and venules (98±7 μm, n=9) in response to α-adrenergic activation by norepinephrine (10−10 to 10−4 M) in the presence of β-adrenergic blockade by alprenolol (10−6 M). In contrast to the situation in vivo, α-adrenergic activation did not constrict isolated coronary arterioles, but constricted isolated coronary venules in a dose-dependent manner over a range of 10−10 to 10−4 M (−27 ±3% maximum diameter change). Coronary arteriolar α-adrenergic constriction was not promoted by 1) subthreshold or vasoactive doses of the vasoconstrictors KCl, angiotensin II, U46619, endothelin-1, neuropeptide Y or arginine vasopressin, 2) inhibition of the presynaptic uptake of norepinephrine by imipramine (10−6 M), 3) inhibition of EDRF synthesis by Ng-monomethyl-L-arginine (10−5 M) or 4) inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis by indomethacin (10−5 M). Furthermore, α-adrenergic activation did not modify microvascular dilatation by adenosine (10−9 to 10−4 M) or nitroglycerin (10−9 to 10−4 M), suggesting that α-adrenergic constriction in vivo is not due to attenuation of cAMP or cGMP-dependent mechanisms of coronary dilatation. In contrast to the lack of constriction in coronary arterioles, canine skeletal muscle arterioles exhibited significant α-adrenergic constriction (−80±4%), maximum diameter change). The coronary venular α-adrenergic constriction was significantly inhibited by both the α1-and α2-adrenergic receptor antagonists, prazosin (10−8 M) and rauwolscine (10−7 M), indicating a mixed population of α1-and α2-adrenergic receptors. These results suggest that coronary arterioles, but not venules, lose α-adrenergic responsiveness during isolation and cannulation, or that the primary coronary microvascular response to α-adrenergic activation is venular constriction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1984) Cardiovascular Pharmacology. Raven Press, New York, pp 303

  2. (1985) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York

  3. Akita H, Yokoyama M, Fukuzaki H (1984) Contractile responses of canine coronary collateral vessels. Jpn Heart J 25: 93–103

    Google Scholar 

  4. Altura BM (1978) Pharmacology of venular smooth muscle: new insights. Microvasc Res 16: 91–117

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chilian WM, Eastham CL, Marcus ML (1989) Redistribution of coronary microvascular resistance produced by dipyridamole. Am J Physiol 256: H883-H890

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chilian WM (1991) Functional distribution of α1-and α2-adrenergic receptors in the coronary microcirculation. Circ 84: 2108–2122

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chilian WM, Layne SM, Eastham CL, Marcus ML (1987) Effects of epinephrine on coronary microvascular diameters. Circ Res 61 (suppl II): II-47–II-53

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chilian WM, Layne SM, Eastham CL, Marcus ML (1989) Heterogeneous microvascular coronary α-adrenergic vasoconstriction. Circ Res 64: 376–388

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dietrich HH, Tyml K (1992) Capillary as a communicating medium in the microvasculature. Microvasc Res 43: 87–99

    Google Scholar 

  10. Defily DV, Patterson JL, Chilian WM (1993) Adenosine modulates α1-adrenergic vasoconstriction of coronary arterioles. Circulation 88: I-470

    Google Scholar 

  11. Downey HF, Grice DP, Jones CE (1991) Systemic hypoxia activates a coronary vasoconstrictor reflex response that is blocked by prazosin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 18: 657–664

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dunn WR, McGrath JC, Wilson VG (1989) Expression of functional postjunctional α2-adrenoceptors in rabbit isolated saphenous artery — a permissive role for angiotensin II? Brit J Pharmac 96: 259–261

    Google Scholar 

  13. Faber JE (1988) In situ analysis of α-adrenoceptors on arteriolar and venular smooth muscle in rat skeletal microcirculation. Circ Res 62: 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gwirtz PA, Overn SP, Mass HJ, Jones CE (1986) Alpha1-adrenergic constriction limits coronary flow and cardiac function in running dogs. American Journal of Physiology 250: H1117-H1126

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henriksen O (1977) Local sympathetic reflex mechanism in regulation of blood flow in human subcutaneous adipose tissue. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 450: 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heusch G, Deussen A (1983) The effects of cardiac nerve stimulation on perfusion of stenotic arteries of the dog. Circ Res 53: 8–15

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heusch G, Deussen A, Schipke J, Thamer V (1984) 68-4 vasoconstriction of large and small canine coronary arteries in vivo. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 6: 961–968

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holtz J, Saeed M, Sommer O, Bassenge E (1982) Norepinephrine constricts the canine coronary bed via postsynaptic α2-adrenoceptors. Eur J Pharmacol 82: 199–202

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang AH, Feigl EO (1988) Adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction helps maintain uniform transmural blood flow distribution during exercise. Circ Res 62: 286–298

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ikeoka K, Faber J (1993) ANG II reverses selective inhibition of α2-adrenoceptors sensitivity after in vitro isolation of arterioles. Am J Physiol 265 (Heart Circ Physiol 34): H1988-H1995

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones CJH, Defily DV, Patterson J, Chilian WM (1993) Endothelium-dependent relaxation competes with α1-and α2-adrenergic constriction in the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 87: 1264–1274

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kelley KO, Feigl EO (1978) Segmental alpha-receptor-mediated vasoconstriction in the canine coronary circulation. Circ Res 43: 908–917

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuo L, Davis MJ, Chilian WM (1990) Endothelium-dependent, flow-induced dilation of isolated coronary arterioles. Am J Physiol 259: H1063-H1070

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kuo L, Davis MJ, Chilian WM (1988) Myogenic activity in isolated subepicardial and subendocardial coronary arterioles. American Journal of Physiology 255: H1558-H1562

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liang IYS, Jones CE (1985) Alpha1-adrenergic blockade increases coronary blood flow during coronary hypoperfusion. American Journal of Physiology 249: H1070-H1077

    Google Scholar 

  26. McGillivray-Anderson KM, Faber JE (1990) Effects of acidosis on contraction of microvascular smooth muscle by α1-and α2-adrenoceptors. Implications for neural and metabolic regulation. Circ Res 66: 1643–1657

    Google Scholar 

  27. McGillivray-Anderson KM, Faber JE (1991) Effect of reduced blood flow on α1-and α2-adrenoceptors constriction of rat skeletal muscle microvessels. Circ Res 69: 165–173

    Google Scholar 

  28. McGrath JC (1982) Evidence for more than one type of post-junctional alpha-adrenoceptor. Biochem Pharmacol 31: 467–484

    Google Scholar 

  29. McGrath JC, Brown CM, Wilson VG (1989) Alpha-adrenoceptors: a critical review. Med Res Rev 9: 407–533

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mohrman DE, Feigl EO (1978) Competition between sympathetic vasoconstriction and metabolic vasodilatation in the canine coronary circulation. Circ Res 42: 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  31. Muldowney SM, Faber JE (1991) Preservation of venular but not arteriolar smooth muscle alpha-adrenoceptor sensitivity during reduced blood flow. Circ Res 69: 1215–1225

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nakayama K, Osol G, Halpern W (1988) Reactivity of isolated porcine coronary resistance arteries to cholinergic and adrenergic drugs and transmural pressure changes. Circ Res 62: 741–748

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quillen J, Sellke FW, Banitt PF, Harrison DG (1992) The effect of norepinephrine on the coronary microcirculation. J Vasc Res 29: 2–7

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rivers RJ, Duling BR (1992) Arteriolar endothelial cell barrier separates two polulations of muscarinic receptors. Am J Physiol (Heart Circ Physiol) 262: H1311-H1315

    Google Scholar 

  35. Segal SS, Duling BR (1986) Communication between feed arteries and microvessels in hamster striated muscle: segmental vascular responses are functionally coordinated. Circ Res 59: 283–290

    Google Scholar 

  36. Templeton AGB, Macmillan J, McGrath JC, Storey ND, Wilson VG (1989) Evidence for prazosin-resistant, rauwolscine-sensitive α-adrenoceptors mediating contraction in the isolated vascular bed of the rat tail. Brit J Pharmac 97: 563–571

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tigno XT, Ley K, Pries AR, Gaehtgens P (1989) Venulo-arterolar communication and propagated response. A possible mechanism for local control of blood flow. Pflugers Arch 414: 450–456

    Google Scholar 

  38. Toda N (1983) Isolated human coronary arteries in response to vasoconstrictor substances. American Journal of Physiology 245: H937-H941

    Google Scholar 

  39. Woodman OL, Vatner SF (1987) Coronary vasoconstriction mediated by α1-and α2-adrenoceptors in conscious dogs. American Journal of Physiology 253: H388-H393

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chilian, W.M., Jones, C.J.H., Kuo, L. et al. α-Adrenergic responses of isolated canine coronary microvessels. Basic Res Cardiol 90, 61–69 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00795124

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00795124

Key Words

Navigation