Advertisement

Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 1394–1397 | Cite as

Comparison of changes in the electrical activity of a single node of ranvier after an increase in the potassium ion concentration in the medium and the action of procaine

  • V. I. Belyaev
Physiology
  • 14 Downloads

Keywords

Public Health Potassium Electrical Activity Single Node Procaine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    V. I. Belyaev, In book: Problems in Lability, Parabiosis, and Inhibition [in Russian], Moscow (1962), p. 25.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. I. Belyaev, Byull. éksper. biol., No. 8 (1963), p. 24.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. I. Belyaev, Byull. éksper. biol., No. 5 (1964), p. 3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. L. Byzov and M. M. Bongard, Fiziol. zh. SSSR, No. 1 (1959), p. 110.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. L. Vasil'ev, Russk. fiziol. zh.,6, Nos. 4–6 (1924), p. 95.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. S. Vorontsov, Russk. fiziol. zh.,7, Nos. 1–6 (1924), p. 79.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. A. Liberman, L. M. Tsofina, and M. N. Vaintsvaig, Biofizika, No. 1 (1961), p. 45.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. A. Maiskii, Biofizika, No. 5 (1963), p. 588.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Ukhtomskii, L. Vasil'ev, and M. Vinogradov, The Theory of Parabiosis [in Russian], Moscow (1927).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. I. Khodorov, Uspekhi sovr. biol.,29, No. 3 (1950), p. 329.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. I. Khodorov, In book: Problems in Lability, Parabiosis, and Inhibition, [in Russian], Moscow (1927), p. 246.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. I. Khodorov, Uspekhi sovr. biol.,54, No. 6 (1962), p. 333.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. I. Khodorov and V. I. Belyaev, Biofizika, No. 4 (1963), p. 461.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. L. Bennett and K. G. Chinburg, J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther.,88 (1946), p. 72.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Hashimura, Jap. J. Physiol.,12 (1962), p. 447.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, J. Physiol.,116, London (1952), p. 449.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. F. Huxley and R. Stämpfli, Ibid.,112, (1951), p. 496.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. C. Lüttgau, Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 271., S. 613 (1960).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Meves, Ibid., S. 65 (1960).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Müller, J. gen. Physiol.,42 (1958), p. 137.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Ooyama and E. B. Wright, J. Neurophysiol.,25 (1962), p. 67.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Shanes, W. Freygang, H. Grundfest, et al., J. gen. Physiol.,42 (1959), p. 793.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Stampfli, Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta,16 (1958), p. 127.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    I. Tasaki, Conduction of the Nervous Impulse [Russian translation.], Moscow (1957).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Idem, J. Physiol.,148 London (1959), p. 306.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. E. Taylor, Am. J. Physiol.,196 (1959), p. 1071.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Weidmann, Proc. Roy Soc. Ser. B,148, Landan (1958), p. 246.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    E. B. Wright and H. Ooyama, Proc. Soc. exp. Biol.,106, New York (1961), p. 387.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau Enterprises, Inc. 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. I. Belyaev
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiological LaboratoryA. V. Vishnevskii Institute of Surgery of the AMN SSSRMoscow

Personalised recommendations