Skip to main content

Comparison of metal homogeneity in grab, quartered, and crushed — sieved portions of stream sediments and metal content change resulting from crushing — sieving activity

Environmental Geology volume 22, pages 186–190 (1993)Cite this article

Abstract

Restricted grain size sediment samples were collected along two streams. Metal content in some samples may have been influenced by landfill emissions. Each sample was divided into a grab portion, a quartered portion, and a portion crushed and sieved to a smaller size and then quartered. A duplicate sample from each of these portions was extracted. The Cu, Pb, Zn, Co, Ba, Fe, Mn, and Ca quantities were determined for each duplicate sample. Relative standard deviation was used to reflect homogeneity of metal content. Metal occurrence represented speciated metals or major components of chemical phases. Results indicated that variation of metal content among portions was uniform and did not vary as a function of absolute metal quantity. Homogeneity was similar in the same size grab and quartered samples. A more homogeneous metal state was displayed by the crushed and sieved sediments. However, this activity enriched softer chemical phases and associated speciated metals. It was concluded that sediments need not be quartered to obtain a better homogeneity of metal distribution and that field samples should not be crushed and sieved prior to chemical analyses. Assessment of sediments affected by metal emission sources must include a knowledge of metal homogeneity in individual samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

References

  • Axtman EV and Luoma SN (1991) Large-scale distribution of metal contamination in the fine-grained sediments of the Clark Fork River, Montana, USA. Appl Geochem 6 (1):75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaing P, Assor R, Jouanneau JM and Weber O (1986) Heavy metal origin and concentration in the sediments of the Point a' Pitre Bay (Guadeloupe-Lesser Antilles). Environ Geol 8 (4):174–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes EA, Posner AM and Quirk JP (1976) The specific adsorption of divalent Cd, Co, Cu, Pb, and Zn on goethite. J Soil Sci 27:154–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadde RR and Laitinen HA (1974) Studies of heavy metal adsorption by hydrous iron and manganese oxides. Anal Chem 46 (13):2022–2026

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RJ (1973) Mechanisms of trace metal transport in rivers. Science 180:71–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding SC and Brown HS (1978) Distribution of selected trace elements in sediments of Pamlico River Estuary, North Carolina. Environ Geol 1 (2):181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinniburgh DG, Jackson ML and Syers JK (1976) Adsorption of alkaline earth, transition and heavy metal cations by hydrous oxide gels of iron and aluminum. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:796–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantei EJ and Coonrod DD (1989) Heavy metal content in the stream sediments adjacent to a sanitary landfill. Environ Geol Water Sci 13 (1):51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantei EJ and Foster MV (1991) Heavy metals in stream sediments: Effect of human activities. Environ Geol Water Sci 18 (2):95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JN (1985) Source of metal contamination in Milltown Reservoir, Montana: An interpretation based on the Clark Fork bank sediment. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, District 7, Helena, Montana

  • Murray JW (1975) The interaction of metal ions at the manganese dioxide-solution interface. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 39:505–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy S and Rust BR (1978) Heavy metal exchange processes in sediment water systems. Environ Geol 2 (3):165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece DE, Feikey JR and Wai CM (1978) Heavy metal pollution in the sediments of the Coeur d'Alene Rier, Idaho. Environ Geol 2 (5):289–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule J (1986) Assessment of trace element geochemistry of Hampton Roads Harbor and Lower Chesapeake Bay area sediments. Environ Geol 8 (4):209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinex SA and Helz GR (1981) Regional geochemistry of trace elements in Chesapeake Bay sediments. Environ Geol 3:315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanful EK, Quigley RM and Nesbitt HW (1988) Heavy metal migration at a landfill site, Sarnia, Ontario, Canada—2: Metal partitioning and geotechnical implications. Appl Geochem 3:623–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim WW (1981) Geochemical investigations on fluvial sediments contaminated by tin mine tailings, Cornwall, England. Environ Geol 3 (5):245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachara JM, Kittrick JA and Harsh JB (1988) The mechanism of Zn2+ adsorption on calcite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 52 (9):2281–2290

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Geology, and Planning, Southwest Missouri State University, 65804, Springfield, Missouri, USA

    E. J. Mantei

  2. Department of Chemistry, Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri, USA

    R. L. Ernst

  3. Geosciences Department, Nanjing University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China

    Y. Zhou

Authors
  1. E. J. Mantei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. L. Ernst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mantei, E.J., Ernst, R.L. & Zhou, Y. Comparison of metal homogeneity in grab, quartered, and crushed — sieved portions of stream sediments and metal content change resulting from crushing — sieving activity. Geo 22, 186–190 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00789330

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00789330

Key words

  • Metal distribution
  • Sediments
  • Crushing
  • Sieving activity