Advertisement

Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 135–139 | Cite as

The inhibitory influence of the bulbar reticular formation and its influence on the spinal cord

  • S. M. Butkhuzi
  • S. P. Narikashvili
Physiology
  • 21 Downloads

Summary

Experiments were performed on intact cats. The authors studied the changes of the effects of direct electrical stimulation of mesencephalic facilitatory and of bulbar inhibitory areas on the rhythmic reflex of antagonists associated with development of ether and chloralose anesthesia.

Experiments demonstrated that distinct generalized inhibition of antagonists, which is observed in condition of ether anesthesia, disappears in 1.5–2 hours after the interruption of anesthesia. At this time the facilitatory effect which is frequently associated with a tonic contraction is still pronounced. If the anesthesia is deepened gradually or at once (by intravenous injection of chloralose) the generalized inhibition of the reflex quivering is again manifested to its full extent after the administration of 15–20 mg/kg of body weight. At the same time the facilitatory effect of the mesencephalic reticular formation is greatly weakened. The inhibitory effect of the bulbar reticular formation appeared to be more resistant to anesthesia: it weakens and disappears only with the large concentrations of the drug (50–60 mg/kg and more).

All this points to the following: 1) the mesencephalic facilitatory and the bulbar inhibiting areas possess different sensitivity and resistance to anesthetics, 2) the inhibitory effect of the reticular formation of the brain stem in nonanesthetized animals is obscured by its more significant facilitating effect on the spinal cord.

Keywords

Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation Intravenous Injection Brain Stem Large Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. [1]
    S. P. Narikashvili, in book: Transactions of the I. Beritashvili Institute of Physiology, Tbilisi, volume 3, pp. 463–476 (1937); Byull. eksptl. biol. i med. volume 4, issue 3, pp. 236–238 (1937). In Russian.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    I. M. Sechenov, in book: I. M. Sechenov, I. P. Pavlov, N. E. Vvedenskii, Physiology of the Nervous System, Moscow, volume 3, book 1, pp. 29–72 (1952). In Russian.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Bartorelli, Schweiz. Arch. Neurol. u. Psychiatr. Bd. 48, S. 370–396 (1941).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Brodal, The Reticular Formation of the Brain Stem. Anatomical Aspects and Functional Correlations, Edinburgh, (1957).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    B. E. Gernandt and C. A. Thulin, J. Neurophysiol, v. 18, p. 113–129 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    F. Harrison, H. W. Magoun and S. W. Ranson, Am. J. Physiol. v. 121, p. 708–718 (1938).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    W. R. Hess, Das Zwischenhirn. Basel, 1954. Diencephalon, New York, (1954).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    W. R. Ingram, S. W. Ranson and F. L. Hannett et al., Arch. Neurol. a. Psychiatr. v. 28, p. 513–541, (1932).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    F. Kleyntjens, K. Koizumi and C. McC. Brooks, Fed. Proc. v. 13, p. 79–80 (1954), Arch. Neurol. Psychiatr. v. 73, p. 425–438, (1955).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. W. Magoun, Science, v. 100, p. 549–550 (1944); Physiol. Rev. v. 30, p. 459–474, (1950); A. Res. Nerv. a Ment. Dis. v. 30, p. 480–492 (1952); Arch. Neurol. a. Psychiatr. v. 67, p. 145–154, (1952).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. W. Magoun and R. J. Rhines, J. Neurophysiol. v. 9, p. 165–171, (1946); v. 9, p. 219–229, (1946), Spasticity, the Strech-Reflex and Extrapyramidal Systems, Springfield, (1947).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. J. Mandell and L. M. N. Bach, Am. J. Physiol. v. 190, p. 330–342, (1957).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. A. Mettler, H. W. Ades and E. Lipman et al., Arch. Neurol. a. Psychiatr. v. 41, p. 984–995, (1939).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    W. T. Niemer and H. W. Magound, J. Comp. Neurol. v. 87, p. 367–379, (1947).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    E. Sigg, S. Ochs and R. W. Gerard, Am. J. Physiol. v. 183, p. 419–426 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. M. Sprague and W. W. Chamber, Am. J. Physiol. v. 176, p. 52–64 (1954).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1959

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Butkhuzi
    • 1
  • S. P. Narikashvili
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysiologyGeorgian SSR Academy of ScienceTbilisi

Personalised recommendations