Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 738–741 | Cite as

Motor and evacuatory function of the digestive tract after extensive resection of the small intestine of dogs

  • T. V. Volkova
Pathological Physiology and General Pathology


A study of gastric and intestinal motility and emptying was made before and after resection of 40–50% of the intestine (either the distal or the proximal portion was removed). X-ray studies were made. One of the adaptive factors of the digestive tract to the new digestive conditions imposed by the resection was a slower movement of food along the remaining portion of the small intestine.


Public Health Small Intestine Digestive Tract Slow Movement Proximal Portion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    P. P. Bryukhanov, A Study of the Digestive Processes in Various Defects in the Region of the Intestine. Dissertation [in Russian] (St. Petersburg, 1913).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. V. Bystrov, Khirurgiya, No. 2, 109 (1957).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. D. Vatman, Nov. khir. arkh.,35, 1, 114 (1935).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. A. Dolina, Sov. med., No. 7, 101 (1957).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. I. Izhmyakova, Vestn. khir., No. 4, 53 (1953).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. A. Kimbarovskii, Nov. khir. arkh.,22, 4, 551 (1931).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. M. Kostyuchenok, Voen.-med. zh., No. 3, 52 (1951).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. I. Kremer, Nov. khir. arkh.,30, 2, 363 (1934).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Lampert, Sov. khir.,5, 6, 285 (1933).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. P. Mitrofanov, Kazansk. med. zh., No. 11, 1360 (1936).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Ya. Odishvili, Transactions of the Institute of Experimental and Clinical Surgery and Hematology AN Georgian SSR, (Tbilisi, 1957), Vol. 7, p. 119.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. D. Rogal', Khirurgiya, No. 2, 110 (1957).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. E. Rurua and L. K. Zakrevskii, Sov. med. No. 4, 80 (1955).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. D. Stasov, A Study of Compensatory Phenomena in Resection of the Intestines. Dissertation [in Russian] (St. Petersburg, 1913).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. V. Tkeshelashvili, Some Problems of the Motor Function of the Small Intestine in Relation to Its Extensive Resection. Author's Abstract of Candidate's Dissertation [in Russian] (Tbilisi, 1954).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. M. Yanovskii and K. M. Sultanov, Med. zh. Uzbekistana, No. 10, 85 (1958).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. L. Althausen et al., Gastroenterology,16, 126 (1950).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. P. U. Jackson and G. S. Linder, S. Afr. J. clin. Sci.2, 205 (1951).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. P. Pilling and S. L. Cresson, Pediatrics,19, 940 (1957).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Sarnoff, Ann. Surg.,78, 745 (1923).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau Enterprises, Inc. 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. V. Volkova
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of the Physiology and Pathology of Digestion Institute of Normal and Pathological PhysiologyAMN SSSRMoscow

Personalised recommendations