Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring social disabilities in mental health

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social functioning is important in relation to mental illness as it can limit the ability to function independently and because it may vary separately from symptoms. This paper summarises and critically reviews the development of the WHO Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. The value of social role theory is described followed by a classification of the relevant assessment scales in this field.

Mental disorders are in general strongly associated with social dysfunctioning, particularly in schizophrenia and the major affective disorders. For a long time social dysfunctioning was considered an epiphenomenon and just a part of the disease process. Criteria for the diagnosis of a mental disorder were and still are often derived from the domains of work and social relationships. There are at least two related reasons why social functioning deserves a closer look:

  1. 1.

    There is an increasing trend to treat patients in the community instead of in the hospital: the changing orientation on community care needs careful evaluation with respect to its consequences. To what extent is survival in the community possible and what is the quality of life like there? Are community programs better than hospital treatment, and for whom? Therefore, separate measurement is justified for evaluation of outcome and costs and benefits.

  2. 2.

    There is growing evidence that the courses of symptomatology and social dysfunctioning may vary relatively independently: social disablement of a patient may be characterized much more by social disabilities than by persistent psychiatric symptoms; the former may call for another kind of action than usually available. For example, psychosocial rehabilitation focuses on cognitive and social abilities of the patient which are crucial for a more or less independent life. Therefore, seperate measurement is justified for the sake of the right choice of treatment.

The usual diagnostic systems such as the ICD and the DSM offer no adequate solution to the problem of classification and assessment of social dysfunctioning as a consequence of mental disorder. We have to look for other classification systems such as the International Classification Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) of the WHO (1980, 1993) which offers a conceptual model to study the long-term consequences in terms of functional disabilities and experienced social handicaps, and the effectiveness of health care to handle these kind of problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Affleck JW, McGuire RJ (1984) The measurement of psychiatric rehabilitation status. A review of the needs and a new scale. Br J Psychiatry 145:517–525

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, third edition (DSM-III). APA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, third revised edition (DSM-III-R) APA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony WA, Kennard WA, O'Brien WF, Forbess R (1986) Psychiatric rehabilitation: past myths and current realities. Commun Ment Health J 22: 249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Badley EM (1993) An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Disabil Rehabil 15: 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle B (1979) Role theory: expectations, identities and behaviours. Columbia

  • Clare AW, Cairns VE (1978) Design, development and use of a standardised interview to assess social maladjustment and dysfunction in community studies. Psychol Med 21: 589–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JE (1980) The description and classification of social disability by means of a taxonomic hierarchy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 27: 140–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JE (1993) Draft papers of IDH-93. Unpublished manuscript, WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf R (1965) Homo Sociologicus. Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle. 5. Aufl. Westdeutscher Verlag. Köln, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1976) The Global Assessment Scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33: 766–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon G (1966) Role theory and illness. A sociological perspective. New Haven

  • Hall JN (1980) Ward rating scales for long stay patients. A review. Psychol Med 10: 277–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Harrington R, Fudge H, Rutter M, Pickles A (1989) Adult Personality Functioning Assessment (APFA). An investigator-based standardized interview. Br J Psychiatry 155: 24–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurry J, Sturt E (1981) Social performance in a population sample: relation to psychiatric symptoms. In: Wing JK, Bebbington P, Robins LN (eds) What is a case? Grant McIntyre, London, pp 202–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong A de, Giel R, Slooff CJ, Wiersma D (1986) Relationship between symptomatology and social disability. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 21: 200–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong A de, Lubbe PM van der (1994) Handleiding van de Groningse Vragenlijst over Sociaal Gedrag (Manual of the Groningen Questionnaire about Social Behaviour). University of Groningen, Department of Social Psychiatry, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong A de, Wiersma D, Lubbe PM van der (1996) Social dysfunction in rehabilitation: classification and assessment. In: Moscarelli M, Rupp A, Sartorius N (eds) Handbook of mental health, economic and health policy, vol. 1; Schizophrenia. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Katschnig H (1983) Methods for measuring social adjustment. In: Helgason T (ed) Methodology in evaluation of psychiatric treatment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 205–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz M, Lyerly SB (1963) Methods of measuring adjustment and social behaviour in the community. I. Rationale, description, discriminative validity and scale development. Psychol Rep 13: 503–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijkamp HJM (1992) Moeilijke rollen. Psychometrisch onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid en validiteit van de Groningse Sociale Beperkingenschaal bij psychiatrische patiënten (Difficult roles. A study into the reliability and validity of the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule in psychiatric patients). Thesis, University of Groningen

  • Lewis A (1995) Health as a social concept. Br J Sociol 4: 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton R (1936) The study of man. New York

  • Lubbe PM van der (1995) Over de ontwikkeling van de Groningse Vragenlijst over Sociaal Gedrag: GVSG (On the development of the Groningen Questionnaire about Social Behaviour, GQSB) Thesis, University of Groningen

  • Morrison RL, Bellack AS (1987) Social functioning of schizophrenic patients: clinical and research issues. Schizophr Bull 13: 715–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagi SZ (1969) Disability and rehabilitation. Columbus Ohio State University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagi SZ (1991) Disability Concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: Pope AM, Tarlov AR (eds) Disability in America. Toward a national agenda for prevention. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington D. C., appendix A, pp 309–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T (1958) Definitions of health and ilness in the light of American values and social structure. In: Jaco EG (ed) Patients physicians, illnesses, Glencoe Ill. Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt S (1981) Social adjustment as a criterion of treatment success. just what are we measuring? Psychiatry 44: 95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt S, Weyman A, Hirsch SR, Hewett S (1980) The Social Behaviour Assessment Schedule (SBAS): rationale, contents, scoring and reliability of a new interview schedule. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 15: 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope AM, Tarlov AR (1991) Disability in America. Toward a national agenda for prevention. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington M, Tyrer PJ (1979) The Social Functioning Schedule. A brief semistructured interview. Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 14: 151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen A, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Parker G (1989) The Life-skills Profile: a measure assessing function and disability in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 15: 325–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Skodol AE, Link BG, Shrout PE, Horwath E (1988a) The revision of axis V in DSM-III-R: should symptoms have been included? Am J Psychiatry 145: 825–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Skodol AE, Link BG, Shrout PE, Horwath E (1988b) Towards construct validity for DSM-III axis V. Psychiatry Res 24: 13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturt E, Wykes R (1987) Assessment schedules for chronic psychiatric patients. Psychol Med 17: 485–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrer PJ (1990) Personality disorder and social functioning. In: Peck DF, Shapiro CM (eds) Measuring human problems. A practical guide. Wiley, Chichester, pp 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace CJ (1984) Community and interpersonal functioning in the course of schizophrenic disorders. Schizophr Bull 10: 233–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace CJ (1986) Functional assessment in rehabilitation. Schizophr Bull 12: 604–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman MM (1975) The assessment of social adjustment. A review of techniques. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32: 357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman MM, Bothwell S (1976) The assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33: 1111–1115

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman MM, Shalomskas D, John K (1981) The assessment of social adjustment. An update. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38: 1250–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma D (1986) Psychological impairments and social disabilities: on the applicability of the ICIDH to psychiatry. Int Rehabil Med 8: 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma D, Jong A de, Ormel J (1988) The Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule: development, relationship with the ICIDH and psychometric properties. Int J Rehabil Res 11: 213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma D, Jong A de, Kraaijkamp HJM, Ormel J (1990) GSDS-II. The Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule, second version. Manual, questionnaire and rating form. University of Groningen. Department of Social Psychiatry, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing JK (1989) The measurement of ‘social disablement’. The MRC social behaviour and social role performance schedules. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 24: 173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth TD, Brink W van den, Ormel J, Koeter MWJ, Oldehinkel AJ (1993) The relationship between social dysfunctioning and psychopathology among primary care attenders. Br J Psychiatry 163: 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (1980) International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. World Health Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiersma, D. Measuring social disabilities in mental health. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 31, 101–108 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00785755

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00785755

Keywords

Navigation