Skip to main content
Log in

The study of different methods of cell division in two transplantable lines of normal and malignant human cells

  • Oncology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Summary

A study was made of modes of division of human cancer cells—HeLa strain—and of human amnion cells with the use of monolayer cultures in synthetic medium “199” with added calf serum. The mitotic, amitotic and nuclear gemmation coefficients were determined during the 7 days of cultivation.

A prevalence of mitotic division over amitosis and nuclear gemmation was noted during the first days of cultivation of amniotic cells, and on the 4th day cultivation of HeLa cells. On the 5th day, amitosis and nuclear gemmation were the prevailing forms of multiplication in the 2 cell strains.

The mitotic coefficient of the HeLa cells decreased by the 7th day; amitosis, as well as solitary and multiple budding of the nucleus proved to be the prevailing form in the 2 strains of cells.

Reduction of mitotic coefficient of the amniotic cells during the same period of cultivation was not so marked, but the prevalence of amitosis and nuclear budding was largely of the same character as in the HeLa cell cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. A. I. Drobyshevskaya and V. P. Mikhailov. In book: Annual Report of the Institute of Experimental Medicine of the AMN SSSR [in Russian], p. 438. Vilna (1957).

  2. S. Ya. Zalkind and L. G. Stepanova. Byull. éksper. biol. 6, 110 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. V. Kolesnikov. In book: Annual Report of the Institute of Experimental Medicine of the AMN SSSR [in Russian], p. 319. Leningrad (1958).

  4. A. T. Kravchenko, V. N. Milyutin, and O. S. Gudima. Microfilming in Biology [in Russian]. Moscow (1963).

  5. T. G. Orlova. Abstracts of Proceedings of the 2nd Scientific Conference to Review the Work of the Moscow Institute of Virus Preparations [in Russian], p. 70, Moscow (1960).

  6. Ya. E. Khesin, Yu. F. Sarycheva, and Yu. N. Mastyukova. In book: The Scientific Basis of the Manufacture of Poliomyelitis Vaccine [in Russian], p. 369. Moscow (1959).

  7. S. Bergmann, S. B. Nilson, and S. J. Olsson. Acta path. microbiol. scand. (1959), v. 47, p. 387.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. V. Fernandes. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. (1958) v. 16, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Fogh and R. O. Lund, Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.) (1957), v. 94, p. 532.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Havflick, Exp. Cell. Res. (1961), v. 23, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. A. Newton and P. Wildy.Ibid. (1959), v. 16, p. 624.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. M. Zitcer and T. H. Dunnebacke. Cancer Res. (1957), v. 17, p. 1047.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glinskii, I.A. The study of different methods of cell division in two transplantable lines of normal and malignant human cells. Bull Exp Biol Med 58, 1219–1222 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00785013

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00785013

Keywords

Navigation