Advertisement

Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 1107–1110 | Cite as

Some aspects of the portal circulation in the liver in shock

  • S. A. Seleznev
Pathological Physiology and General Pathology

Summary

A study was made of the circulation in the portal vein of cats during shock resulting from current. To assess the circulation the author measured the blood pressure in the portal and posterior vena cavas, estimated the portocaval gradient and took repeated roentgenograms of the portal vein with the cardiotrast contrasting thereof. As revealed, the pressure in the portal vein and in the portocaval gradients was rather high even at the late phases of shock, when the arterial pressure had already undergone a considerable drop. This may be attributed to a marked resistance to the blood flow in the intrahepatic portion of the portal circulation, which is confirmed by the roentgeno grams.

Keywords

Public Health Blood Pressure Blood Flow Portal Vein Arterial Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    A. M. Dubinskii and A. M. Makhlina, Abstracts of Proceedings of the Third All-Union Conference of Pathophysiologists [in Russian], p. 59 (Moscow, 1960).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. A. Il'inskii, Byull. Eksper. Biol., 2, 21 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. V. Parin and F. Z. Meerson, Essays on the Clinical Physiology of the Circulation [in Russian] (Moscow, 1960).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. P. Khrabrova, Byull. Eksper. Biol. 2, 23 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Blalock and R. D. Cressman, Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 1939, v. 68, p. 278.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. E. Bradley, In: Shock and Circulatory Homeostasis (New York, 1957), p. 9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. M. Daniel and M. M. J. Prichard, J Physiol (London, 1951), v.114, p. 521, 538.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. W. Friedman, H. A. Frank, and J. Fine, Ann. Surg. 1951, v.134, p. 70.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. F. Gersmeyer, K. H. Gacteyer, and G. Gersmeyer, Z. Kreisl.-Forsch., 1957, Bd.46, S. 459.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. D. Green, L. S. Hall, J. Sexton, et al., Am. J. Physiol, 1959, v.196, p. 196.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Heymans and J. J. Bouckaert, J. Physiol. (London, 1930) v.69, p. 254.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. D. Seneviratne, Quart. J. exp. Physiol. 1949, v.35, p. 77.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. J. Wiggers, D. F. Opdyke, and J. R. Johnson, Am. J. Physiol. 1946, v.146, p. 192.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau Enterprises, Inc. 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Seleznev
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Pathological PhysiologyI. I. Dzhanelidze Emergency Aid Research InstituteLeningrad

Personalised recommendations