Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 1018–1020 | Cite as

Interaction between lymph nodes during immunization

  • L. N. Fontalin
Microbiology and Immunity


Removal of the regional lymph nodes after primary immunization with tetanus toxoid reduced the response of other lymph nodes to the subsequent injection of antigen. It is suggested that the stimulating effect of the regional lymph nodes is due to migration of sensitized lymph cells to the other nodes.


Public Health Lymph Node Regional Lymph Node Tetanus Tetanus Toxoid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    A. Ya. Alymov and L. N. Fontalin, In the Book: Modern Problems of Nervism in Physiology and Pathology [in Russian], Moscow (1958), p. 506.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. F. Vakarina, Localization of Antigen and Antibodies in the Organism of Animals after the Injection of Typhoid Vaccine. Author's abstract of Candidate's Dissertation, Moscow (1957).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. A. Gurvich and G. V. Shumakova, Vestn. AMN SSSR, 1, 57, (1960).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ya. L. Rapoport, Arkh. pat.,2, 3 (1957).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. N. Fontalin, Byull. éksper. biol., 10, 100 (1957).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. N. Fontalin, Byull. éksper. biol., 4, 99 (1958).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. N. Fontalin, In the Book: Problems of General Immunology. Abstracts of Reports, Moscow (1959), p. 45.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. N. Fontalin, Zh. mikrobiol., 4, 66 (1960).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. A. Askonas and R. G. White, Brit. J. exp. Path.,37, 61 (1956).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. M. Burnet, The Clonal Selection Theory of Acquired Immunity, Cambridge (1959).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. M. Burnet, In the Book: Ciba Foundation Tenth Anniversary Symposium on Significant Trends in Medical Research, London (1959), p. 60.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. W. Chase and O. A. Wager, Fed. Proc.,16, 639 (1957).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. E. Fichtelius, On the Fate of the Lymphocyte, Basel (1953).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. E. Ford, J. L. Hamerton, D. W. Barnes, and J. F. Loutit, Nature,177, 452 (1956).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. F. de Gara and D. M. Angevine, J. exp. Med.,78, 27 (1943).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. L. Gowans, In the Book: The Kinetics of Cellular Proliferation, New York (1959), p. 64.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Harris, T. N. Harris, and M. B. Farber, J. Immunol.,72, 148 (1954).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. N. Harris, E. Grimm, and E. Mertens, et al., J. exp. Med.,81, 73 (1945).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. F. Loutit, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.,88, Art. 1, 122 (1960).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Metcalf, Proceedings of the 3-rd Canadian Cancer Research Conference,3, 351, New York (1959).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. L. Oakley, G. H. Warrack, and I. Batty, J. Path. Bact.,61, 179 (1949).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. B. Stavitsky, J. infect. Dis.,94, 306 (1954).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. W. C. Topley, J. Path. Bact.,33, 339 (1930).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. Wesslen, Acta derm-venereol, (Stockh.),32, 265 (1952).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. W. Wissler, F. W. Fitch, and M. F. La Via, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.,88, Art. 1, 134 (1960).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. M. Yoffey, N. B. Everett, and W. O. Reinhardt, In the Book: The Kinetics of Cellular Proliferation, New York (1959), p. 69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau Enterprises, Inc. 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. N. Fontalin
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of the Pathology of Infection Institute of Normal and Pathological PhysiologyAMN SSSRMoscow

Personalised recommendations