Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 316–320 | Cite as

The effect of diagnostic labelling on the lay theory regarding schizophrenic disorders

  • M. C. Angermeyer
  • H. Matschinger
Original Paper


On the basis of a representative survey carried out in Germany in the Autumn of 1990, hypotheses about the effect of diagnostic labelling on lay beliefs regarding schizophrenic disorders were tested. As expected. labelling the disorder as schizophrenia increased the likelihood that biological factors were considered to be aetiologically relevant, while psychosocial stress, which most often was held responsible without labelling, was cited less frequently as a cause. Thus, labelling the disorder as schizophrenia can be assumed to cause lay-aetiological beliefs to more closely approximate theories predominant among psychiatric experts. In addition, both the sufferers themselves as well as their parents were less frequently held responsible for the onset of the disorder. However, with diagnostic labelling the treatment prognosis was assessed less favourably. In sum, our results do not furnish a definite argument either for or against the explicit diagnosing of schizophrenia.


Public Health Schizophrenia Biological Factor Psychosocial Stress Representative Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (1994) Lay beliefs about schizophrenic disorder: the results of a population survey in Germany. Acta Psychiatr Scand 89 [Suppl 382]: 39–45Google Scholar
  2. Hosmer DW, Lemshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Liao TF (1994) Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google Scholar
  4. Link BG, Cullen FF, Frank J, Wozniak J (1987) The social rejection of former mental patients: understanding why labels matter. Am J Sociol 92: 1461–1500Google Scholar
  5. Parsons T (1958) Definitions of health and illness in the light of American values and social structure. In: Jaco EG (ed) Patients, physicians and illness. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Scheff TJ (1966) Being mentally ill. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Whitt HP, Meile RL, Larson LM (1979) Illness role theory, the labelling perspective and the social meanings of mental illness: an empirical test. Soc Sci Med 13A: 655–666Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. Angermeyer
    • 1
  • H. Matschinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations