Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative nature of the influence of N- and M-cholinolytic substances on the bioel'ctric activity of the brain

  • Pharmacology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. N. E. Akopyan, In the Book: Gangleron and Experience in Its Clinical Use [in Russian], Erevan, (1959), p. 51.

  2. N. E. Akopyan, In the Book: Arpenal and Experience in Its Clinical Use [in Russian], Erevan, (1964), p. 57.

  3. S. V. Anichkov and M. A. Grebenkina, Byull. Eksper. Biol. No. 9, (1957), p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. N. Anosov, Nevropatol. i Psikhiatr.,2, (1962), p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. K. Anokhin, Zh. Vyshch. Nervn. Deyat.,4, (1959), p. 489.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. P. Denisenko, Fiziol. Zh. SSR, No. 2 (1962), p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. P. Denisenko, Farmakol. i Toksikol., No. 1, (1962), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. P. Denisenko, In the Book: Pharmacology of New Sedative Agents and Their Clinical Application. Leningrad, (1962), p. 107.

  9. R. Yu. Il'yuchenok and R. U. Ostrovskaya, Byull. Éksper. Biol. No. 7 (1962), p. 43

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Ya. Mikhel'son, In the Book: Gangleron and Experience in its Clinical Application. Erevan, (1959), p. 128.

  11. M. Ya. Mikhel'son, et al. In the Book: Arpenal and Experience in Its Clinical Application. Erevan, (1964), p. 76.

  12. A. I. Roitbak, Bioelectric Phenomena in the Cerebral Cortex [in Russian], Tbilisi, (1955).

  13. G. D. Smirnov and R. Yu. Il'yuchenok, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR, No. 10, (1962), p. 1141.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Bonvallet, P. Dell, and G. Hiebel, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.,6, (1954), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. B. Bradley, In Book: Reticular Formation of the Brain, London, (1957), p. 119.

  16. P. B. Bradley and J. Elkes, Brain,80, (1957), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. O. Chatfield and D. P. Purpura, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.,6, (1954), p. 287.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. G. Longo, Experientia, (Basel),11, (1955), p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Idem, Electroencephalographic Atlas for Pharmacological, Research. Amsterdam, (1962).

  20. D. P. Purpura and H. J. Grundfest, Neurophysiol.,19, (1956), p. 573.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. P. Purpura, M. Girado, and H. Grundfest, Science,125, (1957), p. 1200.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Rinaldi and H. E. Himwich, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat,73, (1955), p. 387.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. B. Rothballer, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.,8, (1956), p. 603.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. J. Vogt, Physiol. (Lond.),123, (1954), p. 451.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baklavadzhyan, O.G. Comparative nature of the influence of N- and M-cholinolytic substances on the bioel'ctric activity of the brain. Bull Exp Biol Med 59, 167–171 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00782722

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00782722

Keywords

Navigation