Theoretical analysis of dissociative adsorption of H2O on Ni(100)
- 73 Downloads
On a clean Ni(100) surface, only molecular adsorption of water is realized. Partial dissociation of H2O is thermodynamically allowed process; however, dissociation of water is impossible because of kinetic limitations.
Modification of the nickel surface by oxygen stabilizes the donor-acceptor pair (H2O/O) on the surface and removes the kinetic limitation in decomposition of water, through a substantial reduction of the activation energy of dissociation.
The promoting role of oxygen is manifested in an increase in the nonuniformity of electron density on the nickel surface in the vicinity of the [Ni]−OH2 bond, which makes it possible to open up a new channel of the reaction in which a high degree of energy compensation in the water dissociation reaction is possible.
KeywordsOxygen Physical Chemistry Nickel Activation Energy Inorganic Chemistry
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.P. R. Norton, in: Fundamental Studies of Heterogeneous Catalysis (Chemical Physics of Solid Surfaces and Heterogeneous Catalysis, Vol. 4), D. A. King and D. P. Woodruff (eds.), Elsevier (1982), pp. 27–94.Google Scholar
- 2.P. A. Thiel and T. E. Madey, Surf. Sci. Rep.,7, 211–338 (1987).Google Scholar
- 3.J. M. Heras and L. Viscido, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng.,30, 281–338 (1988).Google Scholar
- 4.L. Toyoshima and G. A. Somorjai, Catal. Rev.,19, 105–159 (1979).Google Scholar
- 5.B. E. Nieuwenhuys, Surf. Sci.,126, 307–336 (1983).Google Scholar
- 6.C. Benndorf and T. E. Madey, Surf. Sci.,194, 63–91 (1988).Google Scholar
- 7.G. Pirug, C. Ritke, and H. P. Bonzel, Surf. Sci.,241, 289–301 (1991).Google Scholar
- 8.L. Olle, M. Salmeron, and A. M. Baro, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A,3, 1866–1870 (1985).Google Scholar
- 9.C. Benndrof, C. Nobl, and F. Thieme, Surf. Sci.,121, 249–251 (1982).Google Scholar
- 10.C. Benndorf, C. Nobl, and T. E. Madey, Surf. Sci.,138, 292–304 (1984).Google Scholar
- 11.T. E. Madey and F. P. Netzer, Surf. Sci.,117, 549–601 (1982).Google Scholar
- 12.A. B. Anton and D. C. Cadogan, Surf. Sci.,239, L548-L559 (1990).Google Scholar
- 13.A. B. Anderson, Surf. Sci.,105, 159–176 (1981).Google Scholar
- 14.C. W. Bauschlicher, J. Chem. Phys.,83, 3129–3133 (1985).Google Scholar
- 15.H. Yang and J. L. Whitten, Surf. Sci.,223, 131–150 (1989).Google Scholar
- 16.C. F. Melius, C. L. Bisson, and W. D. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B,18, 1647–1650 (1978).Google Scholar
- 17.V. I. Avdeev, I. I. Zakharov, G. M. Zhidomirov, et al., Zh. Strukt. Khim.,33, No. 2, 29–34 (1992).Google Scholar
- 18.V. I. Avdeev and G. M. Zhidomirov, Kinet. Katal.,29, 808–814 (1988).Google Scholar
- 19.G. K. Boreskov, Heterogeneous Catalysis [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1986), pp. 50–68.Google Scholar