Abstract
This article describes the development of a nontraditional aftercare program set in a predominantly rural area. The program was initiated by a citizen's board concerned with the lack of follow-up services provided to patients discharged from a distant state hospital. The planning format as conceived by representatives of this board is outlined and the steps involved in operationalizing specific services and a research program are described. Lastly, a number of limitations of the program and future directions are enumerated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angrist, S., Lefton, M., Dinitz, S., & Passamanick, B.Women after treatment: A study of former mental patients and their normal neighbors. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.
Donlon, P., & Rada, R. Issues in developing quality aftercare clinics for the chronic mentally ill.Community Mental Health Journal, 1976,12, 29–36.
Evenson, R. C., Sletten, I. W., Hedlund, J. L., & Faintich, D. M. CAPS: An automated evaluation system.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1974,131, 531–534.
Freeman, H., & Simmons, O.The mental patient comes home. New York: Wiley, 1963.
Heckel, R., Perry, C., & Reeves, P. G.The discharged mental patient. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1973.
Kiresuk, T., & Sherman, R. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs.Community Mental Health Journal, 1968,4, 443–453.
Mannino, F., & Shore, M. Demonstrating effectiveness in an aftercare program.Social Work, 1974,19, 351–354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kantor, L.E., Kausch, D.F. & Smith, L.L. Development of an aftercare program in a nonmetropolitan area. Community Ment Health J 14, 46–53 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00781310
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00781310