Advertisement

Metal Science and Heat Treatment

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 83–86 | Cite as

Martensitic transformations in steel Kh18N10T in a wide range of strain rates

  • L. P. Loshmanov
  • A. V. Loginov
  • A. N. Golenchenko
  • V. A. Fesenko
Theory
  • 27 Downloads

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The degree of martensitic transformations attending the deformation of metastable austenitic steels is determined by their chemical composition and the test conditions.

     
  2. 2.

    In the process of deformation, at temperatures ttestd without heating of the specimens, the content of martensite is bound to increase with increased degree of deformation. If isothermal test conditions are not ensured and the specimens are heated when deformed, then the content of martensite must be smaller than under isothermal conditions of deformation.

     
  3. 3.

    An increase of the strain rate leads, on the one hand, to a rise of the temperature of the specimens, and on the other hand to a lowering of the “effective” test temperature. The interaction of these two phenomena determines the content of martensite, and consequently the change of properties of metastable austenitic steels under high-speed deformation.

     

Keywords

Martensite Test Temperature Martensitic Transformation Isothermal Condition Austenitic Steel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    M. A. Filippov, V. S. Litvinov, and Yu. R. Nemirovskii, Steels with Metastable Austenite [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. P. Staudhammer, S. E. Franz, S. S. Hecker, and L. E. Murr, “The effect of the strain rate on the formation of martensite in stainless steel 304 (18/8),” in: Shock Waves and Phenomena of High-Speed Deformation of Metals [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. A. Lebedev, B. I. Koval'chuk, V. V. Kosarchuk, and L. V. Zaitseva, “The kinetics of martensitic transformation attending plastic deformation of chrome-nickel austenitic steels,” Probl. Prochn., No. 9, 3–8 (1985).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. G. Stout and P. S. Follansbee, “Strain rate sensitivity strain hardening, and yield behavior of 304L stainless steel,” Trans. ASME,108, 344–353 (1986).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. V. Kosarchuk, L. V. Zaitseva, and V. N. Rudenko, “The effect of the type of stressed state on the kinetics of martensitic transformation in plastic deformation of steel 07Kh18N10T,” Probl. Prochn., No. 9, 48–50 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. P. Bressanelli and A. Moskowitz, “Effects of strain rate, temperature and composition on tensile properties of metastable austenitic stainless steels,” Trans. ASME,59, 223–239 (1966).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. E. Murr, K. P. Staudhammer, and S. S. Hecker, “Effects of strain state and strain rate on deformation-induced transformation in 304 stainless steel: Part II. Microstructural study,” Metal. Trans.,13A, 627–635 (1982).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. N. Zambrzhitskii, “The effect of the strain rate on the martensitic transformation of alloys of the system Fe−Ni−C and of trip steels,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved., No. 4, 842–849 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. V. Loginov, M. M. Astakhov, A. N. Golenchenko, et al., “The mechanical properties of stainless steels type Kh18N10T in a wide range of strain rates,” Probl. Prochn., No. 4, 78–80 (1988).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. B. Olson and M. A. Cohen, “Mechanism for the strain-induced nucleation of martensitic transformation,” J. Less Comm. Metals,28, 107–108 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. W. Meyer, “Dynamic studies of strength and characteristics of a high alloyed steel with respect to thermal activation,” in: Proc. of the Third Oxford Conference, The Inst. of Phys., Vol. 71, London (1984), pp. 81–87.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Colas and C. M. Sellars, “Effect of strain heterogeneity and adiabatic heating on the stress-strain behavior of the austenitic stainless steel,” in: Strength of Metals and Alloys, Proc. 7th Int. Conf., Montreal 12–16 August, 1985, pp. 941–946.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. G. Pushin, R. R. Romanova, and A. I. Uvarov, “The structural mechanism of the anomalous plasticity of steel with metastable austenite,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved.,62, No. 1, 187–196 (1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. P. Loshmanov
  • A. V. Loginov
  • A. N. Golenchenko
  • V. A. Fesenko

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations