Skip to main content
Log in

Manganese deficiency of sugar beet in organic soils

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The manganese content of sugar beet grown in pots of organic soils taken from fields where crops regularly show symptoms of manganese deficiency, and the effects on it of foliar sprays of manganous sulphate and of manganous oxide or manganese silicate frit applied to the soil, of changing the soil pH, air-drying the soil, and growing the plants either in the glasshouse or outside were determined. All the manganese treatments increased the concentration of manganese in the plants and decreased deficiency symptoms, but increased the dry matter yield only slightly. Increasing the pH by liming greatly increased symptoms and decreased the manganese concentration in the dry matter; air-drying the soil before cropping had the opposite effect. Plants grown in pots of the same soil in the glasshouse or outdoors showed similar symptoms and had similar manganese content.

The concentration of manganese in the leaves was related to the percentage of plants with deficiency symptoms and to the concentration of ‘active’ soil manganese. Leaves usually had symptoms when the concentration of manganese in the dried leaves was less than 30 ppm, and always had severe symptoms when they contained less than 15 ppm Mn. The soil analyses suggest that sugar beet grown in organic soil with pH greater than 7.0 and containing less than 40 ppm ‘active’ soil manganese is likely to show deficiency symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dion H. G. and Mann P. J. G., Three-valent manganese in soils. J. Agr. Sci. Cambridge36, 239 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henkens CH. H. and Jongman E., The movement of manganese in the plant and the practical consequences. Neth. J. Agr. Sci.13, 392 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henkens CH. H. and Smilde K. W., Evaluation of glassy frits as micronutrient fertilizers. II Manganese frits.15, 21 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hull, R., Manganese sulphate in relation to speckled yellows. Unpublished data (1941).

  5. Piper C. S., The availability of manganese in the soil. J. Agr. Sci. Cambridge21, 762 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nadirshaw M. and Cornfield A. H., Direct determination of manganese in soil extracts by atomic-absorption spectroscopy. Analyst93, 475 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Savant N. K. and Kibe M. M., Effect of alternate submergence and drying of soil prior to resubmergence on extractable aluminium, iron and manganese in rice soils of the Maharashtra State, India. Soil Sci.108, 440 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smilde K. W., Manganous oxide (MnO) as a fertilizer for controlling manganese deficiency in oats. Neth. J. Agr. Sci.16, 197 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Szilágyi M., Reduction of Fe3+-ion by humic acid preparations. Soil Sci.111, 233 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vömel A. and Ulrich A., Die Blattanalyse zur Ermittlung von Mangan-Mangel bei Rüben. Z. Pflanzenernähr., Düng. Bodenk.102, 28 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. White R. P., Hydroxylamine hydrochloride as a reducing agent for atomic-absorption determinations of manganese in dry-ashed plant tissue. Soil Sci. soc. Am. Proc.33, 478 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farley, R.F., Draycott, A.P. Manganese deficiency of sugar beet in organic soils. Plant Soil 38, 235–244 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00779008

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00779008

Keywords

Navigation