Abstract
This paper presents the viewpoint that congenitally physically children, having never been nondisabled, may experience themselves disabled yet intact, with the disability an integral part of their identity. However, society, with its pervasively negative attitudes toward disability, perceives disabled people as incomplete, defective, and deviant. Hence, congenitally disabled children face the difficult dilemma of integrating these two divergent views of themselves. Parents and professionals are offered guidelines to facilitate the resolution of this dilemma; however, they must first carefully scrutinize their own attitudes toward disability so that these do not unwittingly impede the parenting and treatment processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asch, A. & Rousso, H. (1982).Psychotherapists with disabilities. Theoretical and clinical issues. Unpublished paper presented at conference of the same title, New York City, October 30, 1982.
Cath, S., Glud, F., & Blane, H. (1957). The role of body image in psychotherapy with the physically handicapped.Psychoanalytic Review, 44, 34–40.
Darling, R. (1979).Families against society. A study of reactions to birth defects. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id.Standard, Edition (Vol. 19).
Furman, R. (1968). Excerpts from the analysis of a child with a congenital defect.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 49, 276–79.
Gliedman, J. & Roth, W. (1980).The unexpected minority: Handicapped children in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Goffman, F. (1963).Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Greenacre, P. (1958). Early physical determinants in the development of the sense of identity.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 6, 612–627.
Kolb, L. (1975). Disturbance in the body image. In M.F. Reisen (Ed.),American Handbook of Psychiatry: Vol. 4, Organic disorders and psychosomatic medicine. New York: Basic Books, pp. 810–837.
Lussier, A. (1980). The physical handicap and the body ego.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 265–272.
Mahler, M. & McDevitt, J. (1982). Thoughts on the emergence of the sense of self.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 30, 827–848.
Neiderland, W. (1965). Narcissistic ego impairment in patients with early physical malformation.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 11, 381–395.
Renneker, R. (1957). Countertransference reactions to cancer.Psychosomatic Medicine, 19, 409–418.
Roskies, E. (1972).Abnormality and normality — The mothering of thalidomide children. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Safilios-Rothschild, S. Social and psychological parameters of friendship and intimacy for disabled people. In M., Eisenberg, C. Griggins, and R. Duval (Eds.),Disabled people as second class citizens. New York: Springer Publishing Company, pp. 40–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Harilyn Rousso is director, Disabilities Unlimited, Counseling and Consultative Services; consultant on women and disability, YWCA of N.Y.C.; chairperson, Association of Mental Health Practitioners with Disabilities.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rousso, H. Disabled yet intact: Guidelines for work with congenitally physically disabled youngsters and their parents. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 1, 254–269 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00778687
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00778687