, Volume 75, Issue 4, pp 483–493 | Cite as

Environmental predictions and distributional limits of chromosomal taxa in the Australian grasshopperCaledia captiva (F.)

  • B. Kohlmann
  • H. Nix
  • D. D. Shaw
Original Papers


Correlations between environmental parameters and the distribution of four chromosomal taxa in the acridine grasshopperCaledia captiva (F.) have been analyzed. A bioclimate prediction system (BIOCLIM) was used as a model to determine their bioclimatic envelopes and to predict their probable geographic distributions, based on climatic similarities with actual distributions. New, and formerly unsuspected, distribution areas are predicted. Parapatric boundaries are defined that actually coincide with known limits. The general distribution of the four taxa is correlated with rainfall seasonality and a temperature gradient. Their distributional boundaries are mostly in accordance with extreme values in rainfall in an east-west direction and temperature in a north-south direction. A nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis of one selected narrow parapatric boundary confirms the nature of the geographic correlation with several climatic extreme values. The climatic and vegetation analyses suggest that sharp parapatric distributions can be maintained by gradual environmental influences and that coincidence with abrupt ecotones is not necessary. At least one of the parapatric boundaries seems to be relatively recent in origin (2000–6000 years) and on the basis of the location of extreme climatic values as well as chromosomal and genetic markers it is expected to slowly move further south and east of its present location apparently following a climatically established boundary.

Key words

Caledia captiva Climatic prediction Grasshopper ecology Ecological ordination 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold ML (1986) The heterochromatin of grasshoppers from theCaledia captiva species complex. III. Cytological organisation and sequence evolution in a dispersed highly repeated DNA family. Chromosoma 94:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold ML, Appels R, Shaw DD (1985) The heterochromatin of grasshoppers from theCaledia captiva species complex I. Sequence evolution and conservation in a highly repeated DNA family. Mol Biol Evol 3:29–43Google Scholar
  3. Ashton DH (1981) The ecology of the boundary betweenEucalyptus regnans F. Muell. andE. obliqua L'Hérit. in Victoria. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 11:75–94Google Scholar
  4. Bigelow RS (1965) Hybrid zones and reproductive isolation. Evolution 19:449–458Google Scholar
  5. Booth TH (1985) A new method for assisting species selection. Commonw For Rev 64:241–250Google Scholar
  6. Bull CM (1978) The position and stability of a hybrid zone between the Western Australian frogsRanidella insignifera andR. pseudinsignifera. Aust J Zool 26:305–322Google Scholar
  7. Bull CM (1979) A narrow hybrid zone between two Western Australian frog speciesRanidella insignifera andR. pseudinsignifera: the fitness of hybrids. Heredity 42:381–389Google Scholar
  8. Bull CM, Sharrad RD, Petney TN (1981) Parapatric boundaries between Australian reptile ticks. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 11:95–107Google Scholar
  9. Busby JR (1986) A biogeoclimatic analysis ofNothofagus cunninghamii (Hook.) Oerst in southeastern Australia. Aust J Ecol 11:1–7Google Scholar
  10. Chappell J, Chivas A, Wallensky E, Polach HA, Aharon P (1983) Holocene palaeo-environmental changes, central to north Great Barrier Reef inner zone. BMR J Aust Geol Geophys 8:223–235Google Scholar
  11. Clymo RS (1980) Preliminary survey of the peat-bog Hummell Knowe moss using various numerical methods. Vegetatio 42:129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly JC, Wilkinson P, Shaw DD (1981) Reproductive isolation in relation to allozymic and chromosomal differentiation in the grasshopperCaledia captiva. Evolution 35:1164–1179Google Scholar
  13. Dargie TCD (1984) On the integrated interpretation of indirect site ordinations: a case study using semi-arid vegetation in southeastern Spain. Vegetatio 55:37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Field JG, Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1982) A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 8:37–52Google Scholar
  16. Fisher RA (1936) The utilization of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7:179–188Google Scholar
  17. Fitzpatrick EA, Nix HA (1970) The climatic factor in Australian grassland ecology. In: Moore RM (ed) Australian grasslands. Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  18. Harrison RG (1985) Barriers to gene exchange between closely related cricket species II. Life cycle variation and temporal isolation. Evolution 39:244–259Google Scholar
  19. Hewitt GM, Barton NH (1980) The structure and maintenance of hybrid zones as exemplified byPodisma pedestris. In: Blackman RC, Hewitt GM, Ashburner M (eds) Insect cytogenetics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 149–170Google Scholar
  20. Howard D (1986) A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40:34–43Google Scholar
  21. Hutchinson MF (1981) “MAPROJ-A computer projection system”. CSIRO Division of Land Use Research Technical Paper No. 39. CSIRO, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  22. Hutchinson MF (1983) A new objective method for spatial interpolation of meteorological variables from irregular networks applied to the estimation of monthly mean solar radiation, temperature, precipitation and windrun. United Nations Univ Workshop. Need for Climatic and Hydrologic Data in Agriculture of SE Asia. CanberraGoogle Scholar
  23. Hutchinson MF, Booth TH, McMahon JP, Nix HA (1984) Estimating monthly mean values of daily total solar radiation for Australia. Sol Energy 32:277–290Google Scholar
  24. Jaeger RG (1971) Competitive exclusion as a factor influencing the distribution of two species of terrestrial salamanders. Ecology 52:632–637Google Scholar
  25. Kenkel NC, Orlóci L (1986) Applying metric and non-metric multidimensional scaling to ecological studies: some new results. Ecology 67:919–928Google Scholar
  26. Kershaw AP (1983) The vegetation record from northeastern Australia 7-2 Ka. Proceedings of the First CLIMANZ Conference, Howman's Gap, 1981. Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp 100–101Google Scholar
  27. Key KHL, Balderson J (1972) Distributional relations of two species ofPsednura (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphidae) in the Evans Head area of New South Wales. Aust J Zool 20:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kruskal JB (1964)a Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27Google Scholar
  29. Kruskal JB (1964)b Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29:115–129Google Scholar
  30. Kruskal JB, Young FW, Seery JB (1973) How to use KYST, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. [Unpublished paper] Bell Telephone LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
  31. Littlejohn MJ, Watson GF, Loftus-Hill JJ (1971) Contact hybridization in theCrinia laevis complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Aust J Zool 19:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mackenzie DH, Nix HA (1982) “Australian wildflowers for export: Which species? Where?” Symposium on the Production and Marketing of Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth, pp 34–45Google Scholar
  33. Marchant AD (1988) Apparent introgression of mitochondrial DNA across a narrow hybrid zone in theCaledia captiva species-complex. Heredity 60:39–46Google Scholar
  34. Marchant AD, Arnold ML, Wilkinson P (1988) Gene flow across a chromosomal tension zone I. Relicts of ancient hybridization. Heredity (in press)Google Scholar
  35. Meredith DH (1977) Interspecific agonism in two parapatric chipmunks (Eutamias). Ecology 58:423–430Google Scholar
  36. Miller RS (1964) Ecology and distribution of pocket gophers (Geomyidae) in Colorado. Ecology 45:256–272Google Scholar
  37. Minchin PR (1986) How to use ECOPAK: An ecological database system. Technical Memorandum 86/6. Institute of Biological Resources, Division of Water and Land Resources, CSIRO, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  38. Minchin PR (1987) An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore WS (1977) An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Q Rev Biol 52:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moran C (1979) The structure of the hybrid zone inCaledia captiva. Heredity 42:13–32Google Scholar
  41. Moran C, Shaw DD (1977) Population cytogenetics of the genusCaledia (Orthoptera Acridinae). III Chromosomal polymorphism, racial parapatry and introgression. Chromosoma 63:181–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mrongovius MJ (1979) Cytogenetics of the hybrids of three members of the grasshopper genusVandiemenella (Orthoptera: Eumastacidae: Morabinae). Chromosoma 71:81–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nichols RA, Hewitt GM (1986) Population structure and the shape of a chromosomal cline between two races ofPodisma pedestris (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Biol J Linn Soc 29:301–316Google Scholar
  44. Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH (1980) Statistical package for social sciences. McGraw-Hill, Sydney, pp 434–467Google Scholar
  45. Nix HA (1976) Environmental control of breeding, post-breeding dispersal and migration of birds in the Australian Region. Proc 16th International Ornithological Congress, August 1974, Canberra, pp 272–305Google Scholar
  46. Nix HA (1982) Environmental determinants of biogeography and evolution in Terra Australis. In: Barker WR, Greenslade PJM (eds) Evolution of the flora and fauna in Australia. Peacock Press, Adelaide, pp 47–66Google Scholar
  47. Nix HA (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. In: Longmore R (ed) Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia. Australia Flora and Fauna Series, no 7. Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra, pp 4–15Google Scholar
  48. Oksanen J (1983) Ordination of boreal heath-like vegetation with principal component analysis, correspondence analysis and multidimensional scaling. Vegetatio 52:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prentice IC (1977) Non-metric ordination methods in ecology. J Ecol 65:85–94Google Scholar
  50. Shaw DD (1976) Population cytogenetics of the genusCaledia (Orthoptera Acridinae). I. Inter- and intraspecific karyotype diversity. Chromosoma 54:221–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Shaw DD, Wilkinson P (1980) Chromosomal differentiation, hybrid breakdown and the maintenance of a narrow hybrid zone inCaledia. Chromosoma 80:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shaw DD, Webb GC, Wilkinson P (1976) Population cytogenetics of the genusCaledia (Orthoptera Acridinae) II. Variation in the pattern of C-banding. Chromosoma 56:169–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Shaw DD, Coates DJ, Arnold ML, Wilkinson P (1985) Temporal variation in the chromosomal structure of a hybrid zone and its relationship to karyotypyc repatterning. Heredity 55:293–306Google Scholar
  54. Shaw DD, Marchant AD, Arnold ML, Contreras N (1987) Chromosomal rearrangements, mitochondrial DNA and ribosomal genes: contrasting patterns of introgression across a narrow hybrid zone. In: Brandham PE, Bennett MD (eds) Kew Chromosome Conference III. HMSO (in press)Google Scholar
  55. Shaw DD, Coates DJ, Arnold ML (1988) Complex patterns of chromosomal variation along a latitudinal cline in the grasshopper,Caledia captiva. Genome (in press)Google Scholar
  56. Wahba G, Wendelberger J (1980) Some new mathematical methods for variational objective analysis using splines and cross validation. Month Weather Rev 108:1122–1143Google Scholar
  57. White MJD, Chinnick L (1957) Cytogenetics of the grasshopperMoraba scurra III. Distribution of the 15- and 17-chromosome races. Aust J Zool 5:338–347Google Scholar
  58. White MJD, Blackith RE, Blackith RM (1967) Cytogenetics of theviatica group of morabine grasshoppers I. The “coastal” species. Aust J Zool 15:263–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Kohlmann
    • 2
  • H. Nix
    • 1
  • D. D. Shaw
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Resource and Environmental StudiesAustralian National UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Population Genetics Group, Research School of Biological SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations