Skip to main content
Log in

The in vitro reassembly of rough endoplasmic reticulum: Ribosome binding capacity

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rough endoplasmic reticulum membranes were dissolved in 1% deoxycholate and the deoxycholate was then dialysed out for five days. Well-defined bilayer vesicles were formed only if the dialysis was performed at room temperature for the first six hours. The vesicles were separated into a pelleted fraction (Fraction I) and a fluffy layer (Fraction II) by centrifugation. As measured by amino acid incorporation ability, Fraction II bound polysomes, while Fraction I did not. When smooth endoplasmic reticulum was assembled, it was found that Fraction II so derived had a polysome binding capacity which was more sensitive to increased KCl concentrations (25 mM–100 mM KCl) and that it bound significantly more monosomes than the corresponding fraction derived from rough membranes. The SDS-polyacrylamide polypeptide patterns of the various fractions were compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BartlettG.R. J. Biol. Chem. 234: 466–468 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devillers-ThieryA., T.Kindt, G.Scheele & G.Blobel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72: 5016–5020 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. FugitaS., F.Ogata, J.Nakamura, S.Omata & H.Sugano. Biochem. J. 164: 53–66 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. GalA.L., R.Folman, S.J.Segal, H.H.Czosnek, Y.Shiklosh, N.deGroot & A.A.Hochberg. Life Sci. 21: 779–783 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. JothyS., S.Tay & H.Simpkins. Biochem. J. 132: 637–640 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. LaemmliU.K. Nature 227: 680–685 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. LowryO.H., N.J.Rosebrough, A.L.Farr & R.J.Randall. J. Biol. Chem. 193: 265–275 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  8. McIntoshP.R. & K.O'Toole, Biochem. Biophys. Acta 457: 171–212 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. MontalM. pp. 119–175, in: Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioen. (L.J.Mullins, W.A.Hagins, L.Stryer & C.Newton, eds.). Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto, Cal. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. OhlssonR. & B.Jergil. Eur. J. Biochem. 72: 595–603 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. RackerE., A.F.Knowles & E.Eytan. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 264: 17–33 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. ReynoldsE.S. J. Cell Biol. 17: 208–213 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  13. RollestonF.S. Sub-Cell Biochem. 3: 91–117 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scott-BurdenT. & A.O.Hawtrey. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 54: 1288–1295 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. SpurrA.R. J. Ultrastr. Res. 26: 31–43 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feigenbaum, A.M., De Groot, N. & Hochberg, A.A. The in vitro reassembly of rough endoplasmic reticulum: Ribosome binding capacity. Mol Biol Rep 4, 111–115 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00775971

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00775971

Keywords

Navigation