Advertisement

Soviet Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 51–56 | Cite as

Regularities of variation in the impact strength of some sintered materials at low temperatures

  • I. M. Storozhevskii
  • N. A. Filatova
Test Methods and Properties of Materials
  • 25 Downloads

Summary

  1. 1.

    An experimental study was carried out of the effect of temperature and porosity on the impact strength of sintered materials (bronze, bronze-graphite with 3% graphite, bronze with 5% boron nitride, and iron-nickel and copper-nickel alloys) at low temperatures.

     
  2. 2.

    It was established that the variation of impact strength as a function of temperature has a similar character for cast and sintered materials.

     
  3. 3.

    It was shown that, with increasing porosity, the maximum on the impact strength vs temperature curve becomes flatter.

     
  4. 4.

    It was established that the upper limit of the brittleness range for the iron-nickel, bronze, and bronze- 3% graphite materials lies at about 230° K and that of the copper-nickel material at about 123° K. The bronze- 5% boron nitride material is brittle in the whole temperature range investigated.

     

Keywords

Porosity Graphite Experimental Study Boron Brittle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    G. V. Uzhik, The Low-Temperature Strength and Ductility of Metals [in Russian] (Moscow, Acad. Sci. USSR Press) (1957).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. N. Kosilnets, Zh. Tekhn. Fiz.,16, 5 (1946).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. L. McLee, F. E. Campbell, R. L. Carlson, and L. K. Manning, Mater. Design Enging,56, No. 6 (1959).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mechanical properties of metals at low temperatures, Nat. Bur. Standards, circular N 520, Washington (May 7, 1952).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. P. Tulyakov, Khim. Mashinostr., 1, 2 (1935).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. N. Davidenkov, Dynamic Testing of Metals [in Russian] (Moscow-Leningrad, ONTI, NKTP) (1936).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. M. Vangundy and R. H. Kropschot, ASTM, Bull. N 240 (1959), pp. 47–50.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. E. Lismer, J. Inst. Metals, January,89, Pt 5 (1961), pp. 145–161.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. E. Mikryukov and N. Z. Pozdnyak, Sintered Inelastic Piston Rings of Internal Combustion Engines and Compressors [in Russian] (1958).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. M. Storozhevskii and N. A. Filatova, Poroshkovaya Met., 6 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. G. Dondik, Mechanical Testing of Metals [in Russian] (Kiev, Acad. Sci. Ukr SSR Press) (1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. N. Davidenkov, The Problem of Impact in Metallurgy [in Russian] (Moscow-Leningrad, Acad. Sci. USSR Press) (1938).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. M. Shevandin, Zavodsk. Lab., 7, 858 (1947).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. M. Shevandin, The Susceptibility to Brittleness of Low-Alloy Steels [in Russian] (Moscow, Metallurgizdat) (1953).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. McLean, J. Metals, November, Part 3 (1952), pp. 121–123.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. M. Storozhevskii
    • 1
  • N. A. Filatova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Materials ProblemsAcademy of Sciences, UkrSSRUkraine

Personalised recommendations