# Relative difference in diversity between populations

## Abstract

An entropy is conceived as a functional on the space of probability distributions. It is used as a measure of diversity (variability) of a population. Cross entropy leads to a measure of dissimilarity between populations. In this paper, we provide a new approach to the construction of a measure of dissimilarity between two populations, not depending on the choice of an entropy function, measuring diversity. The approach is based on the principle of majorization which provides an intrinsic method of comparing the diversities of two populations. We obtain a general class of measures of dissimilarity and show some interesting properties of the proposed index. In particular, it is shown that the measure provides a metric on a probability space. The proposed measure of dissimilarity is essentially a measure of relative difference in diversity between two populations. It satisfies an invariance property which is not shared by other measures of dissimilarity which are used in ecological studies. A statistical application of the new method is given.

## Key words and phrases

Diversity dissimilarity cross entropy majorization Schur-convexity ranking and selection## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Agresti, A. (1990).
*Categorical Data Analysis*, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar - Alam, K., Mitra, A., Rizvi, M. H. and Saxena, K. M. Lal (1986). Selection of the most diverse multinomial population,
*Amer. J. Math. Management Sci.*, Special Volume**6**, 65–86.Google Scholar - Dennis, B., Patil, G. P., Rossi, O. and Taillie, C. (1979). A bibliography of literature on ecological diversity and related methodology,
*Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice*, 319–354, International Co-operative Publishing House, Jerusalem.Google Scholar - Dudewicz, E. J. and Van der Meulen, E. C. (1981). Selection procedures for the best binomial population with generalized entropy goodness,
*Tamkang J. Math.*,**12**, 206–208.Google Scholar - Gini, C. (1912). Variabilitá e Mutabilitá, Studi Economico-Giuridici della facoltá di Giurisprodenza dell, Universitá di Cagliari, Anno 3, Part 2, p. 80.Google Scholar
- Gower, J. C. (1985). Measures of similarity, dissimilarity, and distance,
*Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences*(eds. S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson),**5**, 397–405, Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar - Grassle, J. F. and Smith, W. K. (1976). A similarity measure sensitive to the contribution of rare species and its use in investigation of variation in marine benthic communities,
*Oecologia*,**25**, 13–25.Google Scholar - Gupta, S. S. and Huang, D. Y. (1976). On subset selection procedures for the entropy function associated with the binomial populations,
*Sankhyā Ser. A*,**38**, 153–173.Google Scholar - Gupta, S. S. and Wong, W. Y. (1975). Subset selection procedures for finite schemes in information theory,
*Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai*,**16**, 279–291.Google Scholar - Haberman, S. J. (1982). Analysis of dispersion of multinomial responses,
*J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.*,**77**, 568–580.Google Scholar - Kostreva, M. M. (1989). Generalization of Murty's direct algorithm to linear and convex quadratic programming,
*J. Optim. Theory Appl.*,**62**, 63–76.Google Scholar - Light, R. J. and Margolin, B. H. (1971). An analysis of variance for categorical data,
*J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.*,**66**, 534–544.Google Scholar - Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring concentration of wealth,
*J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.*,**9**, 209–212.Google Scholar - Marshall, A. V. and Olkin, I. (1979).
*Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications*, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar - Patil, G. P. and Taillie, C. (1982). Diversity as a concept and its measurement,
*J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.*,**77**, 548–561.Google Scholar - Rao, C. R. (1982
*a*). Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients, a unified approach,*Theoret. Population Biol.*,**21**, 24–43.Google Scholar - Rao, C. R. (1982
*b*). Diversity: its measurement, decomposition, appartionment and analysis,*Sankhyã Ser. A*,**44**, 1–22.Google Scholar - Rao, C. R. (1984). Convexity properties of entropy functions and analysis of diversity,
*Inequalities in Statistics and Probability*, IMS Lecture Notes - Monograph Series, Vol. 5, 68–77, Hayward, California.Google Scholar - Rao, C. R. and Nayak, T. K. (1985). Cross entropy, dissimilarity measures, and characterizations of quadratic entropy,
*IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory*,**31**(5), 589–593.Google Scholar - Rizvi, M. H., Alam, K. and Saxena, K. M. Lal (1987). Selection procedure for multinomial populations with respect to diversity indices,
*Contribution to the Theory and Application of Statistics*(ed. A. E. Gelfard), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar - Schmidt, P. and Strauss, R. P. (1975). The prediction of occupation using multiple logit models,
*Internat. Econom. Rev.*,**16**, 471–486.Google Scholar - Schur, I. (1923). Uber eine Klasse von Mittelbildungen mit Anwendungen die Determinanten,
*Theorie Sitzungsber. Berlin Math. Gesellschaft*,**22**, 9–20 (*Issai Collected Works*(eds. A. Brauer and H. Rohrbach), Vol. II, 416–427, Springer, Berlin, 1973).Google Scholar - Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication,
*Bell Syst. Tech. J.*,**27**, 379–423 and 626–656.Google Scholar - Smith, W. (1989). ANOVA-like similarity analysis using expected species shared,
*Biometrics*,**45**, 873–881.Google Scholar - Smith, W., Grassle, J. F. and Kravitz, D. (1979). Measures of diversity with unbiased estimators,
*Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice*, 177–191, International Co-operative Publishing House, Jerusalem.Google Scholar