Skip to main content
Log in

The physics of detecting torsion and placing limits on its effects

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present the essential principles of torsion-detection physics and evaluate several conceivable types of experiments and observations for actually detecting torsion fields, reemphasizing also the evident impossibility of successfully searching for its manifestations among cosmological relics. In particular, a polarized body, with net intrinsic (fundamental-particle) spin, is essential for detecting a torsion field. One which possesses only orbital angular momentum—rotation—or an unpolarized intrinsic spin density will not feel torsion. The fundamental problem in searching for such fields is the extremely small basic unit of the coupling or interaction energy between the torsion field and spin,ɛ≈(8πG′/c 2)( 2/4). The best way of maximizing the total interaction energy is to increase the spin density of the sourceσ s, and, at the same time the “spin number”S D of the detector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hehl, F. W., Von der Heyde, P., Kerlick, G. D., and Nester, J. M. (1976).Rev. Mod. Phys.,48, 393.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hehl, F. W., Nitsch, J., and Von der Heyde, P. (1980). InGeneral Relativity and Gravitation, Vol. I, A. Held, ed. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 329–355.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Skinner, R., and Gregorash, D. (1976).Phys. Rev. D,14, 3314.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yasskin, P. B., and Stoeger, W. R. (1980).Phys. Rev. D,21, 2081.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neville, D. E. (1980).Phys. Rev. D,21, 869.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neville, D. E. (1980).Phys. Rev. D,21, 2075.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stoeger, W. R., and Yasskin, P. B. (1979).Gen. Rel. Grav.,11, 427.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaempffer, F. A. (1976).Gen. Rel. Grav.,7, 327.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hehl, F. W., and Datta, B. K. (1971).J. Math. Phys.,12, 1334.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kerlick, G. D. (1975).Phys. Rev. D,12, 3004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Audretsch, J. (1981).Phys. Rev. D,24, 1470.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trautman, A. (1972).Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Ser. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys.,20, 895.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hehl, F. W. (1971).Phys. Lett. A,36, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neville, D. E. (1982).Phys. Rev. D,25, 573.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nester, J. M., and Isenberg, J. (1977).Phys. Rev. D,15, 2078.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This essay was awarded an honorable mention in 1984 by the Gravity Research Foundation—Ed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoeger, W.R. The physics of detecting torsion and placing limits on its effects. Gen Relat Gravit 17, 981–988 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773834

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773834

Keywords

Navigation