Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of modifier pH in the generation of enantioselective nickel catalysts

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enantioselective Ni/SiO2 catalysts have been prepared by modification with aqueous solutions of (R)-(+)-tartaric acid (TA) and used in the asymmetric hydrogenation of a prochiral β-keto ester (methylacetoacetate) to a β-hydroxy ester ((R)-(-)-methyl-3-hydroxybutyrate). The simultaneous adsorption of TA and corrosive leaching of surface nickel metal are graphically illustrated and the progress of TA buildup on the catalyst surface with the duration of modification is presented. Variations of modifier pH were found to strongly affect the modification process and influence the ultimate hydrogenation rate and enantioselectivity. The surface coverage by TA is correlated to the asymmetric activity and an optimum fractional coverage of 0.2 is identified; at higher coverages modification with basic TA solutions yielded superior enantioselectivities. While TA treatment in basic media was less corrosive, a proportion of the surface enantioselective nickel sites was leached into solution during the hydrogenation step. The difference in the response of nickel precursors, prepared by impregnation and homogeneous precipitation/deposition, to TA treatment is compared and discussed in terms of metal/support interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Bennett, S. Christie, M.A. Keane, R.D. Peacock and G. Webb, Catal. Today 10 (1991) 1619.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.A. Keane and G. Webb, J. Catal. 136 (1992) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.A. Keane and G. Webb, J. Mol. Catal. 73 (1992) 91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.A. Keane and G. Webb, J. Catal., in press.

  5. M.A. Keane, Zeolites 13 (1993) 14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.A. Keane, Zeolites 13 (1993) 22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Izumi, Adv.Catal. 12 (1983) 215.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.U. Blaser, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2 (1991) 843.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.U. Blaser and M. Muller, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 59 (1991) 73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Tai and Y. Harada,Taylored Metal Catalysts, ed. Y. Iwasawa (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986) p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Bartok,Stereochemistry of Heterogeneous Metal Catalysts (Wiley, New York, 1985) p. 511.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Fu, H.H. Kung and W.M.H. Sachtler, J. Mol. Catal. 42 (1987) 29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Tatsumi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 41 (1968) 408.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.J. Fish and D.F. Ollis, J. Catal. 50 (1977)353.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Hoek and W.M.H. Sachtler, J. Catal. 58 (1979) 276.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.R. Richards, H.H. Kung and W.M.H. Sachtler, J. Mol. Catal. 36 (1986) 329.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.A. Keane and G. Webb, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1991) 1619.

  18. G. Wittmann, G.B. Bartok, M. Bartok and G.V. Smith, J.Mol. Catal. 60(1990) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.A. Vedenyapin, E.I. Klabunovskii, Yu.M. Telanov and N.P. Sokolova, Kinet. Catal. 16 (1975)436.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E.I. Klabunovskii, A.A. Vedenyapin, B.G. Chankvetadze and G.C. Areshidze,Proc. 8th Int. Congr. on Catalysis, Berlin 1984 (Dechema, Frankfurt, 1984) p. 543.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L.J. Bostelaar and W.M.H. Sachtler, J. Mol. Catal. 27(1984)387.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Hoek, H.M. Woerde and W.M.H. Sachtler,Proc. 7th Int. Congr. on Catalysis, Tokyo 1980, eds. K. Tanabe and T. Sieyama (Kodansha / Elsevier, Tokyo / Amsterdam, 1981) p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Harada and Y. Izumi, Chem. Lett. (1978) 1195.

  24. T. Harada, A. Tai, M. Yamamoto, H. Ozaki and Y. Izumi,Proc. 7th Int. Congr. on Catalysis, Tokyo 1980, eds. K. Tanabe and T. Sieyama (Kodansha/Elsevier, Tokyo/Amsterdam, 1981) p. 364.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Nitta, T. Utsumi, T. Imanaka and S. Teranishi, J. Catal. 101 (1986) 376.

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. Yasumori, Y. Inoue and K. Okabe,Proc. Int. Symp. on the Relations Between Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Phenomena, Brussels 1974 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1975) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Coughlan and M.A. Keane, Zeolites 11 (1991) 2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.A. Gronewegen and W.M.H. Sachtler,Proc. 6th Int. Congr. on Catalysis, Vol. 2, London 1976, eds. G.C. Bond, P.B. Wells and F.C. Tompkins (The Chemical Society, London, 1977) p. 1014.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Montes, Ch. Penneman de Bosscheyde, B.K. Hodnett, F. Delannay, P. Grange and B. Delmon, Appl. Catal. 12 (1984) 309.

    Google Scholar 

  30. G.A. Martin, C. Mirodatos and H. Preliaud, Appl. Catal. 1 (1981) 367.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J.T. Richardson, R.J. Dubus, J.G. Crump, P. Desai, U. Osterwalder and T.S. Cale, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 3 (1979) 131.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.T. Houalla, F. Delannay, I. Matsuura and B. Delmon, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 76 (1980) 2128.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Houalla and B. Delmon, Surf. Interf. Anal. 3 (1981) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.W. Geus,Preparation of Catalysts III, eds. B. Delmon, P. Grange, P.A. Jacobs and G. Poncelet (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983)p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  35. O. Clause, M. Kermarec, L. Bonneviot, F. Villain and M. Che, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 4709.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Y. Nitta, F. Sekine, J. Sasaki, T. Imanaka and S. Teranishi, J. Catal. 79 (1983) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  37. D.O. Hubbell and P. Rys, Chimia 24 (1970) 442.

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. Ozaki, A. Tai, S. Kobatake, H. Watanabe and Y. Izumi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 51 (1978) 3559.

    Google Scholar 

  39. G.V. Smith and M. Musoiu, J. Catal. 60 (1979) 184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keane, M.A. The importance of modifier pH in the generation of enantioselective nickel catalysts. Catal Lett 19, 197–209 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00771755

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00771755

Keywords

Navigation