Summary
This approach does not define a probability measure by syntactical structures. It reveals a link between modal logic and mathematical probability theory. This is shown (1) by adding an operator (and two further connectives and constants) to a system of lower predicate calculus and (2) regarding the models of that extended system. These models are models of the modal systemS 5 (without the Barcan formula), where a usual probability measure is defined on their set of possible worlds. Mathematical probability models can be seen as models ofS 5.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bigelow, J. C.: 1976, ‘Possible Worlds Foundations for Probability’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 5, 297–320.
Bigelow, J. C.: 1977, ‘Semantics of Probability’,Synthese 36, 459–471.
Burgess, J. P.: 1969, ‘Probability Logic’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 2, 264–274.
Dempster, A. P.: 1966, ‘New Methods for Reasoning Towards Posterior Distributions Based on Samples’,Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34, 355–374.
Dempster, A. P.: 1967, ‘Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping”,Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 325–339.
Dempster, A. P.: 1968, ‘A Generalization of Bayesian Inference’,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 30, 205–247.
Fenstad, E.: 1969, ‘The Structure of Logical Probabilities’,Synthese 18, 1–23.
Fenstad, E.: 1980, ‘The Structure of Probabilities Defined on First-order Languages’, in Jeffrey, R. C. (ed.),Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, II, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Fisher, R. A.: 1950,Contributions to Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chapman and Hall, New York.
Fisher, R. A.: 1956,Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, Oliver and Boyd, London.
Giere, R. N.: 1973, ‘Objective-Single Case Probability and the Foundations of Statistic’, in: Suppes, P., Henkin, L., Joja, A., and Moisil, Gr. C. (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 467–483.
Giere, R. N.: 1976, ‘A Laplacean Formal Semantics for Single Case Propensities’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 5, 321–359.
Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M. J.: 1968,An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen, London.
Matheron, G.: 1975,Random Sets and Integral Geometry, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, London.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1981, ‘Statistical Explanation Reconsidered’,Synthese 48, 437–472.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1988, ‘Probability, Possibility and Plenitude’, in: Fetzer, J. H. (ed.),Probability and Causality, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dodrecht, pp. 91–108.
Popper, K.: 1959, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Probability’,British Journal of Philosophy of Science 10, 25–42.
Shafer, G.: 1976,Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton-University Press, Princeton.
Walley, P., Fine, T.: 1979, ‘Varieties of Modal (Classificatory) and Comparative Probability’,Synthese 41, 321–374.
Walley, P., Fine, T.: 1982, ‘Towards a Frequency Approach of Upper and Lower Probability’,The Annals of Statistic 10, 741–761.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, C. Probability: A new logico-semantical approach. J Gen Philos Sci 25, 107–124 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00769280
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00769280