General Relativity and Gravitation

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 269–286 | Cite as

The use of algebraic computing in general relativity

  • H. I. Cohen
  • Ö. Leringe
  • Y. Sundblad
Research Articles

Abstract

In the past ten years various computer systems have been developed able to perform algebraic calculations. Unfortunately, the fact that there are ready to use, mostly easily attainable, computer languages and programs for manipulation of non-numerical algebraic data is often overlooked by potential users. Several investigations in general relativity have been performed using such systems in the past few years, and in many cases the calculations were of such a length that it would have been prohibitive to complete them without help from a computer. In the first part of the paper we discuss the type of calculations that can be performed by algebraic systems, and several of these relativistic calculations are very briefly reviewed by way of example. In the second and main part of the paper we present a comparative review of most of the leading algebraic systems. To make the comparison more concrete we have taken two calculations from relativity and programed them, as closely as possible, in the same way for all these systems. It is not necessary for a future user who wants to do the same kind of calculations for other metrics to learn the complete syntax of one of these languages. He can make a slight modification to one of our programs, which we are prepared to distribute.

Keywords

General Relativity Computer System Main Part Slight Modification Differential Geometry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Martin, W. A. and Fateman, R. J. (1971).Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation (ACM, New York), p. 59.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griesmer, J. H. and Jenks, R. D. (1971).Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation (ACM, New York), p. 42.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fletcher, J. G., Clemens, R. W., Matzner, R. A., Thorne, K. S., and Zimmerman, B. A. (1967).Ap. J. Lett.,148, 91.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D'Inverno, R. A. (1970). Thesis, King's College, London University.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bondi, H., Van Der Burg, M., and Metzner, A. (1962).Proc. R. Soc.,A269, 21.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chellone, D. S. and Williams, D. P. (1973).Proc. R. Soc.,A332, 549.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D'Inverno, R. A. and Russell-Clark, R. A. (1971).J. Math. Phys.,12, 1258.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrison, B. K. (1959).Phys. Rev.,116, 1285.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Unti, T. W. J. (1972).Gen. Rel. Grav.,3, 43.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibbons, G. W. and Russell-Clark, R. A. (1973).Phys. Rev. Lett.,30, 398.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barton, D., Bourne, S. R., and Fitch, J. (1970).Comput. J.,13, 243.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCarthy, J. et al. (1962).LISP 1.5 Manual (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strubbe, H. (1974). Manual for Schoonship (CERN Data Division, Geneva).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levy, H. (1968).Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.,64, 1081.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harrison, G. H. (1969).J. Comput. Phys.,4, 594.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D'Inverno, R. A. (1969).Comput. J.,12, 124.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D'Inverno, R. A. and Russell-Clark, R. A. (1974).Comp. J.,17, 229.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall, A. D. (1971).Comm. of the ACM,14, 517.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fike, C. (1970).PL/I for Scientific Programmers (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey), Chap. 12.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hearn, A. C. (1971).Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation (ACM, New York), p. 128.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Collins, G. E. (1971).Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation (ACM, New York), p. 144.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leringe, Ö. (1974). Report TRITA-NA-7403. Dept. of Computer Science, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (1974).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Engeli, M. E. (1969).Ad. Inf. Sys. Sci.,1, 117.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sundblad, Y. (1973). Proceedings of the Third International Colloquium on Advanced Computing Methods in Theoretical Physics, Marseille, A-II. Also available as (1973). Report TRITA-NA-7313 (Dept. of Computer Science, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. I. Cohen
    • 1
  • Ö. Leringe
    • 2
  • Y. Sundblad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Theoretical PhysicsStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholm 70Sweden

Personalised recommendations