Strength of Materials

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 377–381 | Cite as

Plastic deformation resistance of an indium-lead alloy with strain rates of 10−3–103 sec−1

  • N. N. Popov
  • V. A. Mart'yanov
  • S. G. Bezrukov
Scientific and Technical Section


Nonstandard A vs ɛ, N vs ɛ, and log\(\dot \varepsilon \) vs ɛ diagrams were obtained for an indiumlead alloy using a common method together with standard σ vs ɛ diagrams. The strength, deformation, and energy characteristics and their variation coefficient were determined in the\(\dot \varepsilon \)pl.=10−3−103 sec−1 plastic strain rate range. The influence of an increase in ɛpl on the plastic deformation resistance of the indium-lead alloy is revealed in a significant (up to 100%) increase in the strength and energy characteristics.


Plastic Deformation Plastic Strain Common Method Variation Coefficient Energy Characteristic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    S. P. Yatsenko, Indium. Properties and Use [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. E. Vol and I. K. Kagan, The Structure and Properties of Binary Metal Systems [in Russian], Vol. 3, Systems of Gold, Indium, Iridium, Ytterbium, and Yttrium, Nauka, Moscow (1976).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. N. Popov, “The mechanical properties of constructional materials in static and dynamic loading,” Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 4, 8–10 (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. N. Popov and V. M. Barinov, “A vertical test machine for dynamic tests of materials,” Zavod. Lab., 51, No. 5, 77–79 (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. P. Beketov, F. V. Borovko, and G. S. Ratanov, “A two-channel automated instrument for pulsed strain measurement,” Izmer. Tekh., No. 2, 37–38 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. N. Popov, A. K. Krinitskii, and Yu. V. Khomutinin, “Automation of processing of the results of rapid tests of materials,” Zavod. Lab.,52, No. 10, 38–40 (1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. N. Stepnov, Statistical Methods of Processing of Mechanical Test Results: A Handbook [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. N. Popov, V. N. Pozdov, and L. V. Polyakov, “The plastic deformation resistance of 12Kh18N10T and A-43UP corrosion-resistance steels at various strain rates,” Probl. Prochn., No. 7, 62–66 (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Holzer and R. Brown, “The mechanical characteristics of metals in dynamic compression,” Teor. Osn. Inzh. Rasch., Ser. D, No. 3, 67–78 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. V. Stepanov, “The influence of loading rate on the instability of uniform deformation and adiabatic shear in metals,” Probl. Prochn., No. 11, 57–61 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. N. Popov, A. G. Ivanov, V. P. Strekin, and Yu. G. Bornin, “Obtaining the full tensile curves of AMg6 and MA18 alloys at strain rates of 10−3–103 sec−1,” Probl. Prochn., No. 12, 50–54 (1981).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. N. Popov, A. G. Ivanov, and O. M. Savel'eva, “The influence of strain rate on the mechanical properties of TaB10 tantalum alloy,” Probl. Prochn., No. 7, 59–61 (1984).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. G. Kudryashov, F. M. Elkin, I. N. Gur'ev, and H. A. Naryshkina, “The fracture toughness of Mg-Li constructional alloys,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 1, 69–72 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Z. N. Archakova, L. A. Kirillova, and N. A. Blinnikova, “The structure and properties of large plates of 1201 alloy,” Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Metal., No. 3, 48–52 (1982).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. G. Miklyaev, G. S. Neshpor, and V. G. Kudryashov, The Kinetics of Fracture [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. N. Popov
    • 1
  • V. A. Mart'yanov
    • 1
  • S. G. Bezrukov
    • 1
  1. 1.Moscow

Personalised recommendations