Pseudoscience as structurally flawed practice: A reply to A.A. Derksen
- 50 Downloads
I respond to two criticisms levelled by A. A. Derksen in a recent issue of this journal against characterizing pseudoscience as structurally flawed practice: I argue that he surreptitiously invokes this conception, his official view that we should concentrate on pseudoscientists' pretensions rather than their practices notwithstanding; and I critically examine his contention that judgements of scientificity (and pseudoscientificity) cannot properly be made independently of a consideration of whether the relevant theories and practices are empirically well-confirmed.
Key wordspseudoscience A. A. Derksen epistemology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.