Skip to main content
Log in

The behavior of the gravitational field near the initial singularity

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ultralocal representation of the canonically quantized gravitational field is used to obtain the evolution of coherent states in the immediate neighborhood of the singularity. It is shown that smearing functions play the role of classical fields since they correspond to cosmological solutions around the singularity. A special class of ultralocal coherent states is shown to contain the essential aspects of the dynamics of the system when we choose a simple representation for the field operators of the theory. When the ultralocality condition is broken a conjecture will be made about the quantum evolution of coherent states in the classical limit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lifshitz, E. M., and Khalatnikov, I. M. (1963).Adv. Phys.,12, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belinskii, V. A., Khalatnikov, I. M., and Lifshitz, E. M. (1970).Adv. Phys.,19, 525.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belinskii, V. A., Khalatnikov, I. M., and Lifshitz, E. M. (1982).Adv. Phys.,31, 639.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eardley, D., Liang, E., and Sachs, R. (1972).J. Math. Phys.,13, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liang, E. (1972).Phys. Rev. D,5, 2458.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klauder, J. (1971).Acta Phys. Austr. Suppl. VIII, 227; (1973). Functional Techniques and their Applications, Lectures in Theoretical Physics, W. E. Brittin, ed. (Colorado University Press, Boulder).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dirac, P. A. M. (1958).Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A,246, 333.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., and Misner, C. (1962). inGravitation, An Introduction to Current Research, L. Witten. ed. (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wheeler, J. A. (1964). inRelativity Groups and Topology, B. S. De Witt, ed. (Gordon and Breach, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Witt, B. S. (1967).Phys. Rev.,160, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isham, C. J. (1976).Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A,351, 209.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klauder, J., in Relativity, M. Carmeli, S. Fickler, and L. Witten, ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Teitelboim, C. (1973).Ann. Phys. (New York),79, 542.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hojman, S. A., Kuchar, K., and Teitèlboim, C. (1976).Ann. Phys. (New York),96, 88.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kuchar, K., inRelativity, Astrophysics and Cosmology, W. Israel, ed. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baierlein, R., Sharp, D., and Wheeler, J. (1962).Phys. Rev.,126, 1864; York, J. (1972).Phys. Rev. Lett.,28, 1082.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Landau, L. D., and Lifshitz, E. M.,The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Misner, C. (1969).Phys. Rev.,186, 1319.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Misner, C., inMagic Without Magic, J. Klauder, ed. (Freeman San Francisco, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pilati, M. (1983).Phys. Rev. D,28, 729.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Francisco, G., and Pilati, M. (1985).Phys. Rev. D,31, 241.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stueckelberg, E. C. G. (1941).Helv. Phys. Acta.,14, 23, 322, 588.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feynman, R. P. (1950).Phys. Rev.,80, 440.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Horwitz, L. P., and Rorhlich, F. (1981).Phys. Rev. D,24, 1528; Horwitz, L. P., and Lavil, Y. (1982).Phys. Rev. D,26, 819.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Henneaux, M, and Teitelboim, C. (1982).Ann. Phys.,143, 127; Teitelboim, C. (1982).Phys. Rev. D,25, 3159.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klauder, J., inPath. Integrals and Their Applications, C. J. Papadopoulos and J. T. Devresee, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hepp, K. (1974).Commun. Math. Phys.,35, 265.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Isham, C. J., and Kakas, A., A group theoretic approach to the canonical quantization of gravity, Imperial College preprint 83-84/44.

  29. Francisco, G. (1984).Classical and Quantum Gravity,1, 621.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ryan, M., and Shepley, L.,Homogeneous Relativistic Cosmologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Barrow, J. (1982).Phys. Rep.,85, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Francisco, G., Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London (January 84).

  33. Ryan, M.,Hamiltonian Cosmology (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francisco, G. The behavior of the gravitational field near the initial singularity. Gen Relat Gravit 18, 287–308 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00765888

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00765888

Keywords

Navigation