Skip to main content
Log in

Time and the propensity interpretation of probability

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The prime concern of this paper is with the nature of probability. It is argued that questions concerning the nature of probability are intimately linked to questions about the nature of time. The case study here concerns the single case propensity interpretation of probability. It is argued that while this interpretation of probability has a natural place in the quantum theory, the metaphysical picture of time to be found in relativity theory is incompatible with such a treatment of probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Bohm, D.: 1989,Quantum Theory, Dover NY.

  • Cartwright, N. D.: 1987, ‘Max Born and the Reality of Quantum Probabilities’, in Kruger, Gigerenzer and Morgan (eds.),The Probabilistic Revolution, MIT Press, pp. 409–416.

  • Christensen, F.: 1978, ‘The Theory of Space-like Time’, in Fraser (ed.),The Study of Time III, Springer-Verlag, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, F.: 1981, ‘The Problem of Inertia’,Philosophy of Science 48, 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eells, E.: 1983, ‘Objective Probability Theory Theory’,Synthese 57, 387–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G. F. R. and Williams, R. M.: 1988,Flat and Curved Space-Time, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H.: 1977, ‘A World of Dispositions’,Synthese 34, 397–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H.: 1983, ‘Probability and Objectivity in Deterministic and Indeterministic Situations’,Synthese 48, 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. T.: 1972,Logic Matters, Blackwell.

  • Gibbins, P.: 1987,Particles and Paradoxes, Cambridge University Press.

  • Hanna, J. F.: 1981, ‘Single Case Propensities and the Explanation of Single Events’,Synthese 48, 409–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1959, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Probability’,The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10, 10–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1967, ‘Quantum Mechanics without “The Observer”’, in Bunge (ed.),Quantum Theory and Reality, Springer-Verlag, NY pp. 7–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1982,Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, Rowman and Littlefield, Totawa, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1987, ‘Space-Time’, inQuiddities, Harvard University Press.

  • Robinson, M. C.: 1969, ‘Alpha-Particle Emission — A Violation of the Usual Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’,Physics Letters, Vol. 30A, pp. 69–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, N.: 1991, ‘Probabilistic Physics and the Metaphysics of Time’South African Journal of Philosophy 10, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1963,Philosophy and Scientific Realism, RKP, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shanks, N. Time and the propensity interpretation of probability. J Gen Philos Sci 24, 293–302 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764391

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764391

Key words

Navigation