Abstract
We begin by setting out a view of learning as framework-building; enabling learners to shift their perspectives. For us, this expresses the essential unity of many human endeavours — in particular, for our purposes, children's learning, teachers' theory-building and the evolution of scientific understanding. We identify two frameworks which, we contend, are currently limiting the vision of teachers in fundamental ways and with serious consequences for their students. One is a transmission perspective on learning (in which New South Wales schooling has traditionally been steeped) and the other, a limiting conception of and anxious approach to technology (significantly impeding its meaningful penetration into schools). To learn how to help teachers break free of these restraints, we provided an opportunity for our teachers to become learners themselves in a technological context based on developmentalist views of learning and teaching. Here they became self-directing, challenged and fulfilled, gaining feelings of control over the technology, and each developed a powerful and personal appreciation of another framework for learning and teaching. In what they did, we can identify approaches which enabled a plurality of epistemologies to flourish. In conclusion, we predict a key role for these kinds of technological contexts in learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbib, M. & Hesse, M.: 1986,The Construction of Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ausubel, D.: 1978,Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Baird, J., Gunstone, R., Penna, C., Fensham, P. & White, R.: 1990, ‘Researching the Balance Between Cognition and Affect in Science Teaching and Learning’,Research in Science Education 20, 11–20.
Biddulph, F.: 1987, ‘A Case Study in Teacher Change: an Intermediate School Syndicate Tries the ‘Generative’ Approach in Science Teaching’, Working paper no. 213, Science Education Research Unit, University of Waikato, Hamilton.
Board of Studies: 1991,Science and Technology K-6 Syllabus and Support Document, New South Wales Board of Studies, Sydney.
Bruner, J.: 1977, Preface, 1977, in J. Bruner, 1978,The Process of Education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Claxton, G.: 1990,Teaching to Learn: A Direction for Education, Cassell, London.
Cosgrove, M., Loughton, J. & Forret, M.: 1990, ‘Technological Simulations with Lego in Teacher Education’,Computers in N. Z. Schools 2(1), 32–36.
Cosgrove, M. & Schaverien, L.: 1992, ‘The Child as Technologist’, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Hamilton.
DiSessa, A.: 1983, ‘Phenomenology and the Evolution of Intuition’, in D. Gentner & A. Stevens (eds.),Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 15–33.
Driver, R.: 1983, ‘The Fallacy of Induction in Science Teaching’, in R. Driver (ed.),The Pupil as Scientist?, The Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Faire, J. & Cosgrove, M.: 1988,Teaching Primary Science, Waikato Education Centre, Hamilton.
Fensham, P.: 1991, ‘Science Education in Early Childhood Education — a Diagnosis of a Chronic Illness’,Australian Journal of Early Childhood 16(3), 3–8.
Hardy, T., Bearlin, M. & Kirkwood, V.: 1990, ‘Outcomes of the Primary and Early Childhood Science and Technology Education Project at the University of Canberra’,Research in Science Education 20, 142–151.
Harel, I.: 1991,Children Designers: Interdisciplinary Constructions for Learning and Knowing Mathematics in a Computer-rich School, Ablex, New Jersey.
Kuhn, T.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second Edition Enlarged),International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 2(2), Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Latour, B.: 1987,Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nash, M.: 1991, ‘The Teacher as Coach: Analysing Classroom Interaction’, course paper, School of Teacher Education, University of Technology, Sydney.
Osborne, R.: 1981, ‘Children's Ideas About Electric Current’,N. Z. Science Teacher 29, 12–15.
Osborne, R.: 1983, ‘Towards Modifying Children's Ideas About Electric Current’,Research in Science and Technological Education 1(1), 73–82.
Papert, S.: 1980,Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Harvester Press, Sussex.
Papert, S.: 1991, ‘Situating Constructionism’, in I. Harel & S. Papert (eds.),Constructionism, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1–11.
Popper, K.: 1970, ‘Normal Science and its Dangers’, in I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, London, 51–58.
Ramsden, P.: 1984, ‘The Context of Learning’, in F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (eds.),The Experience of Learning, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 144–164.
Rennie, L.: 1987, ‘Teachers' and Pupils' Perceptions of Technology and the Implications for Curriculum’,Research in Science and Technological Education 5(2), 121–133.
Schön, D.: 1987, ‘Preparing Professionals for the Demands of Practice’, in D. Schön (ed.),Educating the Reflective Practitioner', Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Stephenson, J. & Weil, S. (eds.): 1992,Quality in Learning: a Capability Approach in Higher Education, Kogan Page, London.
Turkle, S.: 1984,The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, Granada, London.
Turkle, S & Papert, S.: 1991, ‘Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete’, in I. Harel & S. Papert (eds.),Constructionism, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 161–191.
Turney, C., Eltis, K., Hatton, N., Owens, L., Towler, J. & Wright, R.: 1987, ‘Introduction to the skills courses’, in C. Turney, K. Eltis, N. Hatton, L. Owens, J. Towler & R. Wright (eds.),Sydney Micro-skills Redeveloped: Series 2 Handbook, University of Sydney Press, Sydney, 1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Mark Cosgrove teaches in teacher education programs in the Faculty of Education at the University of Technology, Sydney. He studies the history and development of ideas in science and technology and their roles in cultures, and is exploring the notion that learning and technology are natural, biological phenomena. Lynette Schaverien is a research scholar investigating the learning and teaching of science and technology in primary schools. She is interested in developing teaching approaches which foster and sustain children's natural curiosity, and styles of mentoring which will regenerate teachers' powers to exploit that curiosity in classrooms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaverien, L., Cosgrove, M. Technology learning 2: Towards reawakening the technologists within primary teachers. Int J Technol Des Educ 5, 51–68 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763652
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763652