Advertisement

Topoi

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 31–36 | Cite as

Why we need a relevant theory of conditionals

  • Edwin D. Mares
Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents ConR (‘Conditional R’), a logic of conditionals based on Anderson and Belnap's system R. A Routley-Meyer-style semantics for ConR is given for the system (the completeness of ConR over this semantics is proved in E. Mares and A. Fuhrmann, ‘A Relevant Theory of Conditionals’ (unpublished MS)). Moreover, it is argued that adopting a relevant theory of conditionals will improve certain theories that utilize conditionals, i.e. Lewis' theory of causation, Lewis' dyadic deontic logic, and Chellas' dyadic deontic logic.

Keywords

Modal Logic Relevant Theory Relevant Logic Conditional Logic Conditional Obligation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chellas, B. F.: 1974, ‘Conditional Obligation’ in S. Stenlund (Ed.) (1974), pp. 23–33.Google Scholar
  2. Chellas, B. F.: 1975, ‘Basic Conditional Logic’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 133–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chellas, B. F.: 1980,Modal Logic: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, J. M.: 1986, ‘Relevance Logic and Entailment’ in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (Eds.),Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 117–229.Google Scholar
  5. Fuhrmann, A.: 1990, ‘Models for Relevant Modal Logics’,Studia Logica 49, 501–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewis, D. K.: 1973a,Counterfactuals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, D. K.: 1973b, ‘Causation’,Journal of Philosophy 70, 556–567. Reprinted in Lewis (1986), pp. 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lewis, D. K.: 1974, ‘Semantic Analysis for Dyadic Deontic Logic’ in S. Stenlund (Ed.) (1974), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, D. K.: 1986,Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mares, E. D.: 1992, ‘Classically Complete Modal Relevant Logics’,Zeitschrift für Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  11. Mares, E. D. and Fuhrmann, A.: unpublished, ‘A Relevant Theory of Conditionals’,Journal of Philosophical Logic, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  12. Routley, F. R. and Meyer, R. K.: 1973, ‘The Semantics of Entailment (I)’ in H. Leblanc (Ed.),Truth, Syntax, and Modality, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 199–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Routley, F. R., Meyer, R. K., Brady, R. T. and Plumwood, V.: 1982,Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, Atascadero: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
  14. Segerberg, K. 1990, ‘Notes on Conditional Logic’,Studia Logica 48, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stenlund, S. (Ed.): 1974,Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis. Essays Dedicated to Stig Kanger on his Fiftieth Birthday, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwin D. Mares
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations