, Volume 15, Issue 1–3, pp 243–251 | Cite as

Evaluation of membranes for use in on-line cell separation during mammalian cell perfusion processes

  • Heino Büntemeyer
  • Christoph Böhme
  • Jürgen Lehmann


In this study two microporous hollow fibre membranes were evaluated for their use as cell retention device in continuous perfusion systems. A chemically modified permanent hydrophillic PTFE membrane and a hydrophilized PP membrane were tested. To investigate the filtration characteristics under process conditions each membrane was tested during a long term perfusion cultivation of a hybridoma cell line. In both cultivations the conditions influencing membrane filtration (e.g. transmembrane flux) were kept constant. Filtration behaviour was investigated by monitoring transmembrane pressure and protein permeability. Transmembrane pressure was measured on-line with an autoclavable piezo-resistive pressure sensor. Protein permeability was determined by quantitative evaluation of unreduced, Coomassie stained SDS-PAGE. The membrane fouling process influences the filtration characteristics of both membranes in a different way. After fermentation the PP membrane was blocked by a thick gel layer located in the big outer pores of the asymmetric membrane structure. The hydraulic resistance was higher but the protein permeability was slightly better than of the PTFE membrane. For this reason the PP membrane should be preferred. On the other hand, transmembrane pressure decreases slower when the PTFE membrane is used, which favours this membrane for long term cultivations, especially when low molecular weight proteins (<30 KD) are produced.

Key words

Hybridomate monoclonal antibody perfusion microfiltration membrane fouling 







Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blasey HD (1990) Untersuchung zur Optimierung eines Perfusion-streaktorsystems für die Kultivierung von Animalzellen. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hannover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  2. Blasey HD and Jäger V (1991) Strategies to increase the efficiency of membrane aerated and perfused animal cell bioreactors by an improved medium perfusion. In: Animal Cell Culture and Production of Biologicals, Sasaki R and Ikura K (eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 61–73.Google Scholar
  3. Bülles J, Barziuk H, Klossom RJ, Schickle HP and Gronau S (1990)Pharmacia Application Paper, A 49 6/90.Google Scholar
  4. Büntemeyer H, Bödeker BGD and Lehmann J (1987) Membrane-stirrer-reactor for bubble free aeration and perfusion. In: Modern Approaches to Animal Cell Technology Spier RE and Griffiths JB (eds) Butterworth, London, 411–419.Google Scholar
  5. Büntemeyer H, Lütkemeyer D and Lehman J (1991) Optimization of serum-free processes for antibody production. Cytotechnology 5:57–67.Google Scholar
  6. Fenge C, Klein C, Heuer C, Siegel U and Fraune E (1993) Agitation, aeration and perfusion modules for cell culture bioreactors. Cytotechnology 11:233–244.Google Scholar
  7. Flaschel E, Wandrey C and Kula M-R (1983) Ultrafiltration for the separation of biocatalysis. In: Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Fiechter A (ed), Springer, Berlin, Vol 26: 73–142.Google Scholar
  8. Meireles M (1991) Effects of protein fouling on the apparent pore size distribution of sieving membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 56:13–28.Google Scholar
  9. Le MS and Gollan KL (1989) Fouling of microporous membranes in biological applications. Journal of Membrane Science 40:231–242.Google Scholar
  10. Lehmann J, Vorlop J and Büntemeyer H (1988) Bubble free reactors and their development for continuous culture with cell recycle. In: Animal Cell Biotechnology 3, Spier RE and Griffiths JB (eds), Academic Press, London, 221–237.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heino Büntemeyer
    • 1
  • Christoph Böhme
    • 1
  • Jürgen Lehmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Cell Culture Technology, Technical FacultyUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations