Advertisement

Child and Youth Care Forum

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 459–476 | Cite as

Enhancing screening for child and youth care work with problem-specific measures: An example with big brothers/big sisters volunteers

  • Keith C. Herman
Articles

Abstract

Big BrothersJBig Sisters (BBIBS) organizations attempt to identify positive role models for youth. Agencies utilize lengthy personality inventories to screen their applicants. However, these measures lack specific scales to assess many detrimental volunteer characteristics (pedophilia and child abuse potential, drug and alcohol problems, interpersonal shortcomings, and emotional instabilities). Several brief, problem-specific scales designed to assess these qualities could effectively supplement BBBS screening programs.

Keywords

Alcohol Social Psychology Child Abuse Screening Program Role Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, G. (1992).The Abel Screen. Atlanta, GA: Behavioral Medicine Institute of Atlanta.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association (1987)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual: 3rd Revision (DSMIII-R). Philadelphia, PA: APA.Google Scholar
  3. Atten, D.W., & Milner, J.S. (1987). Child abuse potential and work satisfaction in daycare employees.Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 117–123.Google Scholar
  4. Behrens, G. (1988):16PF personality characteristics related to child abuse. Champaign, IL: IPAT.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 461–571.Google Scholar
  6. Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Whatcom County (1990).Casework Manual. Bellingham, WA: BB/BS of Whatcom County.Google Scholar
  7. Bloxum, B.M., (1978). The 16PF. In O.K. Buros (Ed.),The 8th mental measurements yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carrilio, T. (1988).Development of effective measures to screen volunteers working with children, report, Philadelphia, PA: Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America.Google Scholar
  9. Cattell, R., Eber, H., & Tatsuoka, T. (1986).The 16 PF Handbook. Champaign, IL: IPAT.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, S.E., & Robinson, D.A. (1987). Use of the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory with a college population.Journal of American College Health, 36, 180–184.Google Scholar
  11. Coopersmith, S. (1967).The antecedents of self-esteem. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  12. Corcoran, K., & Fischer, J. (1987). Measures for clinical practice. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.24(4), 349–354.Google Scholar
  14. Earls, C.M. (1992). Clinical issues in the psychological assessment of child molesters. In W. O'Donohue & J. H. Geer (Eds.),The sexual abuse of children: Clinical issues, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Ewing, J., & Rouse, B. (1970).Identifying hidden alcoholism. Paper presented at 29th International Congress on Alcoholism and Drug Dependency. Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Favazza, A.R., & Lannell, B. (1977). Screening for alcoholism among college students.American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1414–1416.Google Scholar
  17. Fitts, W.W. (1965).Tennessee Self-Concept Scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Tests.Google Scholar
  18. Goodwin, D.W. (1981). Alcoholism and alcoholic psychoses. In H.I. Kaplan & B.J. Sadock, (Eds.)Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry III (4th ed.), (Vol. 1). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  19. Heck, E.J., & Lichtenberg, J.W. (1990) Validity of the CAGE in screening problem drinking in college students.Journal of College Student Development, 31, 359–364.Google Scholar
  20. Herman, K.C. (1992).Appropriate use of the CAP in a BB/BS setting. Bellingham, WA: BB/BS of Whatcom County.Google Scholar
  21. Herman, K.C., & Usita, P.M. (in press).Predictive validity of the 16 PF in screening Big Brothers/Big Sisters volunteers. Psychological Reports.Google Scholar
  22. Hirschfield, R.M.A., Klerman, G.L., Gough, H.G., Barrett, J., Korchin, S.J., & Chodoff, P. (1977). A measure of interpersonal dependency.Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 610–618.Google Scholar
  23. Hough, L.M., Eaton, N.K., Dunnette, M.B., Kamp, J.D., & McCloy, R.A. (1990). Criterion-related validity of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on these validities.Journal of Applied Psychology (monograph), 75(5), 581–595.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, H.W., & Joy, D.S. (1987).Use of the Personnel Selection Inventory for child care workers: A summary, unpublished technical report (TR 66). Park Ridge, IL: London House, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, H.W., Joy, D.S., Werner, S.H., & Orban, J.A. (1991). Criterion-related validity of a pre-employment integrity inventory: A large scale between-groups comparison.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 131–136.Google Scholar
  26. Kendall, C., Hollon, S.D., Beck, A.T., Hammen, C.L., & Ingram, R.E. (1987). Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 289–299.Google Scholar
  27. Kilkunas, W. (1988).Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory, unpublished dissertation. Indiana: Ball State University.Google Scholar
  28. Klein, L. (1988).Program management manual. Philadelphia, PA: BB/BSA.Google Scholar
  29. Lanning, K.V. (1986).Child molesters: A behavioral analysis. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, February.Google Scholar
  30. Lichtenberg, B. (1956). On the selection of the Big Brother volunteer.Social Casework, 37, 396–400.Google Scholar
  31. London House, Inc. (1980).The Personnel Selection Inventory. Park Ridge, IL: London House Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lorr, M., Youniss, R.P., & Stefic, E.C. (1991). An inventory of social skills.Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(3), 506–520.Google Scholar
  33. Mayer, A. (1985).Sexual abuse: Cause consequences, and treatment of incestuous and pedophilic acts. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  34. McCormack, A., & Selvaggio, M. (1989). Screening for pedophiles in youth-oriented agencies.Social Casework, 70(1), 37–43.Google Scholar
  35. McKenna, T. (1988). Psychological testing (national memorandum). Philadelphia, PA: BB/BS.Google Scholar
  36. McKenna, T., Richards, M.H., Kirby, J.L., Brown, A.L., & Halpern, P.J. (1989). Psychological testing: Insurance and legal issues. Big Brother/Big Sisters National Conference Seminar.Google Scholar
  37. Meissen, G.J., & Lounsbury, J.W. (1981). A comparison of expectations of volunteers, children, and parents in a Big Brother/Big Sister program.Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 250–256.Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. (1984). Testing the “Side-Bet Theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations.Journal of Applied Psvchology, 69(3), 372–378.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, G.A. (1988). The Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI). Bloomington, IN: The SASSI Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Milner, J.S. (1986).The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: Manual (2nd ed.). DeKalb, IL: Psytec.Google Scholar
  41. Milner, J.S., Gold, R.G., Ayoub, C., & Jacewitz, M.M. (1984). Predictive validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 879–884.Google Scholar
  42. Moriarty, A. (1990). Deterring the molester and abuser: Pre-employment testing for child and youth care workers.Child & Youth Care Quarterly, 19(1), 59–66.Google Scholar
  43. Mufson, D.W. (1986). Selecting child care workers for adolescents: The California Psychological Inventory.Child Welfare, 65(1), 83–88.Google Scholar
  44. Murphy, K.R., & Davidshofer, C.O. (1988).Psychological testing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Murphy, W.D., & Peters, J.M. (1992). Profiling child sex abusers: Psychological considerations.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19(1), 24–37.Google Scholar
  46. Nichols, H.R., & Molinder, I. (1984).Multiphasic Sex Inventory, manual. Tacoma, WA: 437 Bowes Dr.Google Scholar
  47. Okami, P., & Goldberg, A. (1992). Personality correlates of pedophilia: Are they reliable indicators?The Journal of Sex Research, 29(3), 297–328.Google Scholar
  48. Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T., & Boulian, P.V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603–609.Google Scholar
  49. Robertson, K.R., & Milner, J.S. (1985). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 86–88.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenberg, M. (1979).Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  51. Ross, H.E., Gavin, D.R., & Skinner, H.A. (1990). Diagnostic validity of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test and the Alcohol Dependence Scale in the assessment of DSM-III alcohol disorders.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 51(6), 506–513.Google Scholar
  52. Rubin, A., & Thorelli, I.M. (1984). Egoistic motives and longevity of participation by social service volunteers.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(3), 223–235.Google Scholar
  53. Sarason, I.G., Johnson, J.H., & Siegal, J.M. (1978). Assessing the Impact of Life Changes: Development of a Life Experiences Survey.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 932–946.Google Scholar
  54. Schouten, P.G.W., & Simon, W.T. (1992). Validity of phallometric measures with sexual offenders: Comments on the Quinsey, Laws, and Hall debate.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 812–814.Google Scholar
  55. Selzer, M.L. (1971). The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument.American Journal of Psychiatry, 127(12) 1653–1658.Google Scholar
  56. Selzer, M.L., Vinokur, A., & van Rooijen, L. (1975). A self-administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST).Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36(1), 117–126.Google Scholar
  57. Serling, D.A., & Betz, N.E. (1990). Development and evaluation of a measure of fear of commitment.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(1), 91–97.Google Scholar
  58. Sherin, K. (1982). Screening for alcoholism.American Family Practice, 26, 179–181.Google Scholar
  59. Silber, T.J., Capon, M., & Kuperschmit, I. (1985). Administration of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) at a Student Health Service.Journal of American College Health, 33(6), 229–233.Google Scholar
  60. Simon, W.T., & Schouten, P.G.W. (1991). Plethysmography in the assessment and treatment of sexual deviance: An overview.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, D.S., Collins, M., Kreisberg, J.P., Volpicelli, J.R., & Alterman, A.I. (1987). Screening for problem drinking in college freshmen.Journal of College Health, 36, 89–94.Google Scholar
  62. Spielberger, C.D., Jacobs, G.A., Russell, S., & Crane, R.J. (1983). Assessment of anger: The state-trait anger scale. In J.N. Butcher & C.D. Spielberger (Eds.),Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 122–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. Styles, M.B., & Morrow, K.V. (1992).Understanding how youth and elders form relationships: A study of four Linking Lifetimes programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  64. Thorelli, I. M., & Appel, V.H. (1978).Who is the effective volunteer? Characteristics of successful Big Brothers. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  65. Walker, J.R. (1992).The personal interview. Lowell, MA: Big Brother/Big Sister of Greater Lowell, Inc.Google Scholar
  66. Wasmund, W.C., & Tate, T.F. (1988). Personality and performance: Attributes of effective child care workers.Child Welfare, 67(4), 291–299.Google Scholar
  67. Westhuis, D., & Thyer, B.A. (1986).Development and validation of the Clinical Anxiety Scale: A rapid assessment instrument for empirical practice, unpublished ms. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  68. Winefield, H.R., Winefield, A.H., & Tiggemann, M. (1992). Social support and psychological well-being in young adults: The Multi-Dimensional Support Scale.Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 198–210.Google Scholar
  69. Wylie, R.C. (1989).Measures of Self-concept. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  70. Zuckerman, M. (1979).Trains, states, situations and uncertainty.Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1, 43–54.Google Scholar
  71. Zuckerman, M. (1985). The 16PF. In J.V. Mitchell (Ed.),The 9th mental measurements yearbook, Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  72. Zung, B.J., & Charalampous, K.D. (1975). Item analysis of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36(1), 127–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith C. Herman
    • 1
  1. 1.Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Whatcom CountyWashington

Personalised recommendations