Skip to main content
Log in

Canonical quantization without conjugate momenta

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the traditional form of canonical quantization, certain field components (not having “conjugate” momenta) must be regarded as noncanonical. This long-known distinction enters modern gauge theories, when they are canonically quantized as by Kugo and Ojima. We avoid that peculiarity by not using any conjugate “momenta” at all. In our formulation, canonical quantization can be related to Feynman's path integral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs,Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965); L. S. Schulman,Techniques and Applications of Path Integration (Wiley, New York, 1981); Velo and Wightman,(3) p. 2; Huang,(12) pp. 122–147; Itzykson and Zuber,(16) pp. 425–474.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Nishijima,Fields and Particles (Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1969), pp. 265–269; Velo, Wightman,(3) p. 1; Itzykson and Zuber,(16) pp. 261–285; Schweber,(28) p. 690; Roman,(29) p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Velo and A. S. Wightman, eds.,Renormalization Theory (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976); many others can be traced from there or from R. A. Brandt,Fortschr. Phys. 18, 249–283 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Kugo and I. Ojima,Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 1–130 (1979); I. J. R. Aitchison,An Informal Introduction to Gauge Field Theories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982), p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kugo and Ojima, (4) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Jackiw and G. Preparata,Phys. Rev. 185, 1929–1940 (1969); D. J. Gross and R. Jackiw,Nucl. Phys. B 14, 269–284 (1969); Itzykson and Zuber,(16) p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman,PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That (Benjamin, New York, 1964, Reading, Massachusetts 1978); N. N. Bogolubov, A. A. Logunov, and I. T. Todorov,Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory (Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts 1975); R. F. Streater,Rep. Prog. Phys. 38, 771–846 (1975); A. H. Völkel,Fields, Particles, and Currents (Springer, Berlin, 1977); Kugo and Ojima,(4) p. 107; Jost,(21) pp. 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Nakanishi,Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 2078 (1980); Kugo and Ojima,(4) p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nishijima, (2) p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Reeh and S. Schlieder,Nuovo Cimento 22, 1051–1068 (1961); Kugo and Ojima,(4) p. 111; Streater and Wightman,(7) Sec. 4–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. P. Cheng and L. F. Li,Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics (Oxford University, Oxford 1984), p. 3; Itzykson and Zuber,(16) p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Huang,Quarks, Leptons, and Gauge Fields (World Scientific, Singapore, 1982), p. 171; R. Rajaraman,Solitons and Instantons (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982); Cheng, Li,(11) p. 476; Itzykson and Zuber,(16) p. 572.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Fujikawa,Phys. Rev. D 31, 341–351 (1985); Huang,(12) pp. 268–270; L. Baulieu,Nucl. Phys. B 241, 557–588 (1984); R. Delbourgo and P. D. Jarvis,J. Phys. G 10, 591–598 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Kawasaki, T. Kimura, and K. Kitago,Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 2085–2102 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kugo and Ojima, (4) pp. 29 and 102.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber,Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980), p. 261; Cheng and Li,(11) p. 7; Roman,(30) p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. J. Dyson,Phys. Rev. 75, 1736–1755 (1949); J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell,Relativistic Quantum Fields (McGraw-Hill, New York 1964), p. 174; Jauch and Rohrlich,(26) p. 76; Schweber,(28) p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Haag,Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 29, No. 12 (1955); Streater and Wightman,(7) p. 165; Roman,(29) p. 391.

  19. A. Patrascioiu,Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1102–1105 (1985); H. Cheng and E. C. Tsai, “Canonical quantization of non-Abelian gauge field theories,” MIT preprint, March 1985; B. S. De Witt and R. Stora, eds.,Relativity, Groups and Topology II (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nishijima, (2) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Jost,The General Theory of Quantized Fields (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1965), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jost,(22) p. 135.

  23. Kugo and Ojima, (4) p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Nakanishi,Prog. Theor. Phys. 59, 972–985 (1978), p. 975.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O. Steinmann,Ann. Phys. 157, 232–254 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Schwinger,Phys. Rev. 82, 914–927 (1951); J. M. Jauch and F. Rohrlich,The Theory of Electrons and Photons (Springer, New York, 1976), p. 16; Roman,(29) p. 60; J. Schwinger,Quantum Kinematics and Dynamics (Benjamin, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. E. Peierls,Proc. R. Soc. London A 214, 143–157 (1952); Nishijima,(2) Sec. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. S. Schweber,An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (Row, Peterson & Co., Evanston, 1961), p. 223; Völkel,(7) p. 75; Cheng and Li,(11) p. 22; Itzykson and Zuber,(16) p. 145; Jost,(21) p. 40; and many others.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Roman,Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Wiley, New York, 1969), p. 109; G. Wentzel,Quantum Theory of Fields (Interscience, New York, 1949), p. 170; Jauch and Rohrlich,(26) p. 56; and many others.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. M. Henley and W. Thirring,Elementary Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. Kuchař, private communication, march 1985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Just, K., The, L.S. Canonical quantization without conjugate momenta. Found Phys 16, 1127–1141 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00761284

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00761284

Keywords

Navigation