Skip to main content
Log in

Physical interpretation of vacuum solutions of Einstein's equations. Part I. Time-independent solutions

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is a review of interpretations which have been given to some well known solutions of the vacuum equations. Special attention is paid to those of Schwarzschild, Curzon and Kerr, and it is argued that the bizarre topologies they have been endowed with are physically unrealistic. Among others discussed are the two-centres solution of Bach and Weyl, the NUT solution, and solutions for an infinite line-mass, both static and rotating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kramer, D., Stephani, H., MacCallum, M. A. H., and Herlt, E. (1980).Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. (1973).Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Einstein, A., and Rosen, N. (1935).Phys. Rev 48, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lynden-Bell, D., and Katz, J. (1990).Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 247, 651.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gautreau, R. (1980).Nuovo Cimento 56B, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hawking, S. W., and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973).The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bel, L. (1969).J. Math. Phys. 10, 1501.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cooperstock, F. I., and Junevicus, G. J. G. (1973).Nuovo Cimento 16B, 387.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCrea, W. H. (1964).Astrophys. Norvegica 9, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stachel, J. (1968).Phys. Lett. 27A, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gautreau, R., and Anderson, J. L. (1967).Phys. Lett. 25A, 291.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooperstock, F. I., and Junevicus, G. J. G. (1974).Int. J. Theor. Phys. 9, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scott, S. M., and Szekeres, P. (1986).Gen. Rel. Grav. 18, 557.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hernandez, W. C. (1967).Phys. Rev. 153, 1359.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marek, J. J. J. (1967).Phys. Rev. 163, 1373.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Darmois, G. (1927).Mémorial des Sciences Mathematiques (Gauthier-Villars, Paris), Fasc. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Erez, G., and Rosen, N. (1959).Bull. Res. Council Israel 8F, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zipoy, D. M. (1966).J. Math. Phys. 7, 1137.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Voorhees, B. H. (1970).Phys. Rev. D2, 2119.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Esposito, F. P., and Witten, L. (1975).Phys. Lett. 58B, 357.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Papadopoulos, D., Stewart, B. W., and Witten, L. (1981).Phys. Rev. D24, 320.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stewart, B. W., Papadopoulos, D., Witten, L., Berezdivin, R., Herrera, L. (1982).Gen. Rel. Grav. 14, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bonnor, W. B., and Sackfeild, A. (1968).Commun. Math. Phys. 8, 338.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Morgan, T., and Morgan, L. (1969).Phys. Rev. 183, 1097; (1970).Phys. Rev. D 2, 2756.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lynden-Bell, D., and Pineault, S. (1978).Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 185, 679; (1978).ibid. 185, 695.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lemos, J. P. S. (1989).Class. Quant. Grav. 6, 1219.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chamorro, A., Gregory, R., and Stewart, J. M. (1987).Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A413, 251.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bach, R., and Weyl, H. (1922).Math. Z. 13, 134.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Israel, W. (1977).Phys. Rev. D 15, 935.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Katz, A. (1968).J. Math. Phys. 9, 983.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kinnersley, W., and Walker, M. (1970).Phys. Rev. D 2, 1359.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Farhoosh, H., and Zimmerman, R. L. (1980).Phys. Rev. D 21, 317.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bonnor, W. B. (1983).Gen. Rel. Grav. 15, 535.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bonnor, W. B., and Martins, M. A. P. (1991).Class. Quant. Grav. 8, 727.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Evans, A. B. (1977).J. Phys. A 10, 1305.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bonnor, W. B. (1979).J. Phys. A 12, 847.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kinnersley, W. (1969).J. Math. Phys. 10, 1195.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lathrop, J. D., and Orsene, M. S. (1980).J. Math. Phys. 21, 152.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stela, J., and Kramer, D. (1990).Acta Physica Polonica B21, 843.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Martins, M. A. P. (1992). Ph.d. thesis, University of London, in preparation.

  41. Ehlers, J., and Kundt, W. (1962). InGravitation. An introduction to current research, L. Witten, ed. (John Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bonnor, W. B. (1990).Wissenschaft. Z. der Friedrich-Schiller Universitat Jena 39, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Horský, J. (1968).Czech. J. Phys. 18, 569.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gautreau, R., and Hoffman, R. B. (1969).Nuovo Cimenta B61, 411.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ruban, V. A. (1986).Soviet Astronomy 30(2), 142.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Papapetrou, A. (1953).Annalen Physik 12, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rindler, W., and Perlick, V. (1990).Gen. Rel. Grav. 22, 1067.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Krasinski, A. (1978).Ann. Phys. 112, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  49. McManus, D. (1991).Class. Quant. Grav. 8, 863.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gutsunaev, Ts. I., and Manko, V. S. (1989).Class. Quant. Grav. 6, L137.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Castejón-Amenedo, J., MacCallum, M. A. H., and Manko, V. S. (1989).Class. Quant. Grav. 6, L211.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tomimatsu, A., and Sato, H. (1972).Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1344.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tomimatsu, A., and Sato, H. (1973).Prog. Theor. Phys. 50, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cosgrove, C. M. (1977).J.Phys. A10, 1481.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cosgrove, C. M. (1978).J.Phys. A11, 2389, 2405.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kramer, D., and Neugebauer, G. (1980).Phys. Lett. 75A, 259.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dietz, W., and Hoenselaers, C. (1982).Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 778.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bičak, J., and Hoenselaers, C. (1985).Phys. Rev. D 31, 2476.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tomimatsu, A. (1983).Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, 385.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hoenselaers, C. (1986). InProceedings of the IV Marcel Grossmann meeting in General Relativity, Rome, R. Ruffini, ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Misner, C. W. (1963).J. Math. Phys. 4, 924.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Misner, C. W. (1967). InLectures in Applied Mathematics, J. Ehlers, ed. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Taub, A. H. (1951).Ann. Math. 53, 472.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bonnor, W. B. (1969).Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 66, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sackfield, A. (1971).Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 70, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Demiański, M., and Newman, E. T. (1966).Bulletin de l'Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Ser. Sciences Phys. 14, 653.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Dowker, J. S. (1974).Gen. Rel. Grav. 5, 603.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zimmerman, R. L., and Shahir, B. Y. (1989).Gen. Rel. Grav. 21, 821.

    Google Scholar 

  69. van Stockum, W. J. (1937).Proc. R. Soc. Edin. 57, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Bonnor, W. B. (1980).J. Phys. A13, 2121.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Som, M. M., Teixeira, A. F. F., and Idel Wolk. (1976).Gen. Rel. Grav. 7, 263.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Embacher, F. (1983).J. Math. Phys. 24, 1182.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Jordan, S. R., and McCrea, J. D. (1982).J. Phys. A15, 1807.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Plebański, J., and Demiański, M. (1976).Ann. Phys. (NY) 98, 98.

    Google Scholar 

  75. McCrea, J. D. (1976).J. Phys. A9, 697.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wald, R. M. (1984).General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonnor, W.B. Physical interpretation of vacuum solutions of Einstein's equations. Part I. Time-independent solutions. Gen Relat Gravit 24, 551–574 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00760137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00760137

Keywords

Navigation