Skip to main content
Log in

Shifting sex roles: The silence of the family therapy literature

  • Articles
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article suggests that it is important for family therapists to be attuned to the struggles families are experiencing in relation to their changing sex role mores. Traditional ideas about what is feminine and masculine still exist while new realities with new values are emerging. Although one would expect the family therapy literature to be discussing and clarifying the implications of sex role shifts for individuals within the family and for the family as a whole, it has been surprisingly silent. This article reviews the concept of sex roles and discusses it from the perspective of the dichotomization of gender. Object relations theory is suggested as a framework by which sex role differentiation and particularly its more polarized aspect can be understood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  • Bayes, M. & Newton, P.Women in authority: A socio-psychological analysis. Paper presented at the National Scientific Meeting of the A.K. Rice Institute, April, 1976.

References

  • Booth, A. Wife's employment and husband's stress: A replication and refutation.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977,39, 645–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G.Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I.K., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., Rosenkrantz, P.S., & Vogel, S.R. Sex role stereotypes and clinical judgements of mental health.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970,34, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R., & Weir, T. Relationship of wives' employment status to husband, wife, and pair satisfaction and performance.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976,38, 279–287. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R., & Weir, T. Some personality differences between members of one-career and two-career families.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976,38, 453–459. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnerstein, D.The mermaid and the minotaur: Sexual arrangements and human malaise. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. Once more the inner space: Letter to a former student. In J. Strouse (Ed.),Women and analysis. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, T. Treatment of the father in family therapy.Family Process, 1969,8, 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. Who has the power? The marital struggle.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1971,33, 445–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, V.Essays in feminism. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W. The relationship between sex roles, marital status and mental illness. In A.G. Kaplan & J.P. Bean (Eds.),Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Reading toward a psychology of androgyny. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, P., & Guerin, K. Theoretical aspects and clinical relevance of the multigenerational model of family therapy. In P.J. Guerin (Ed.),Family therapy, New York: Gardner Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J., & Hoffman, L.Techniques of family therapy. New York: Basic Books, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R. A feminist approach to family therapy.Family Process, 1978,17, 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, S. & Werner, E. Dominance in marital decision making in women's liberation and non-women's liberation families.Family Process, 1975,14, 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, M. Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women.Journal of Social Issues, 1972,28, 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, B. Consciousness-raising groups as therapy for women. In V. Franks & V. Burtle (Eds.),Women in therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., & Stewart, R. (Eds.). Sex differences: Cultural and developmental dimensions. New York: Urizon Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marecek, J., & Kravetz, D. Women and mental health: A review of feminist change efforts.Psychiatry, 1977,40, 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman, M. Observations on sex role research.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1971,33, 772–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S.Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R.Family, socialization and interaction process New York: The Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peal, E. Normal sex roles: An historical analysis.Family Process, 1975,14, 389–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, M. Beyond resource theory: Another look at factors enabling women to affect family interaction.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976,38, 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, B. & Labeff, E. Sex roles and feminism revisited: An intergenerational attitude comparison.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1977,39, 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. The dimensions of power distribution in the family. InContemporary marriage: Structure, dynamics, and therapy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, A. Cultural values, female role expectancies, and therapeutic goals: Research and interpretation. In V. Franks & V. Burtle (Eds.)Women in therapy: New psychotherapies for a changing society. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R., Peter, T.C., Marsh, S., & Peters, M. An object-relations approach to psychotherapy with marital couples, families, and children.Family Process, 1975,14, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresemer, D., & Pleck, J. Sex-role boundaries and resistance to sex-role change.Women's Studies, 1974,2, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, C. The importance to the family therapist of being impotent.The Family, 1977,4, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the certificate in Family Therapy, Smith College School for Social Work, Northampton, MA, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joslyn, B.E. Shifting sex roles: The silence of the family therapy literature. Clin Soc Work J 10, 39–51 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759871

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759871

Keywords

Navigation