Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of various compounds used as diluents in tableting

  • Technology
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    Calcium hydrophosphate, calcium sulfate, basic magnesium carbonate, beet sugar, and glucose are compared as diluents in tableting toxic and strongly aggressive medicinal preparations.

  2. 2.

    It is shown that tableted preparations based on calcium hydrophosphate, calcium sulfate and basic magnesium carbonate are superior in quality and have more effect on the compacting conditions than those based on beet sugar and glucose.

  3. 3.

    It is shown that calcium hydrophosphate, calcium sulfate, and basic magnesium carbonate can be used as diluents in tableting promedol, codeine, ethylmorphine hydrochloride, diabazol, phenobarbital, papaverine hydrochloride, caffeine-sodium benzoate, and also mixtures containing phenobarbital and papaverine hydrochloride.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. W. C. Gunsel and L. Lachman, J. Pharm. Sci.,52, 178 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Patent No. 237196 (1964).

  3. J. Arends, Apoth Ztg.,62, 158 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. N. Duvall et al., J. Pharm. Sci.,54, 1196 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hasegawa, J. Pharm. Bull (Tokyo),5, 15 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spanish Patent No. 296149 (1964).

  7. R. C. Daoust and M. J. Lynch, Drug. Cosmetic Ind.,93, 26, 88, 92 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Mitsuda, Bull. Inst. Chem. Res., Kyoto Univ.,33, 114 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. A. Ivanovskaya et al., Med. Prom. SSSR, No. 9, 24 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Burlinson, J. Pharm. (London),6, 1055 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Nogami et al., Chem. Pharm. Bull.,7, 331 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. P. Perlman et al., Drug Cosmetic Ind.,94, 660, 780, 782 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Gold and B. T. Palermo, J. Pharm. Sci.,54, 310 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. M. Raff et al., J. Pharm. Sci.,50, 76 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Nakai and Y. Kubo, Chem. Pharm. Bull.,8, 634 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  16. East German Patent No. 36133 (1965).

  17. C. D. Fox et al., Drug Cosmetic Ind.,92, 161, 258 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  18. American Patent No. 3200039 (1965).

  19. J. Jaffe and N. E. Foss, J. Am. Pharm. Ass., Sci. Ed.,48, 26 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  20. American Patent No. 2479583 (1949).

  21. G. Gold and J. A. Campbell, J. Pharm. Sci.,53, 52 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu. A. Blagovidova and A. G. Lyukshenkov, Med. Prom. SSSR, No. 9, 15 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. G. Shafer et al., J. Am. Pharm. Ass., Sci. Ed.,45, 114 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Lee et al., J. Pharm. Sci.,54, 1153 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Khimiko Farmatsevticheskii Zhurnal, No. 2, pp. 51–56, February, 1969.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gandel', V.G. Comparative study of various compounds used as diluents in tableting. Pharm Chem J 3, 109–113 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759341

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759341

Keywords

Navigation