Advertisement

Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 329–341 | Cite as

Children in Foster Care: Possible factors affecting permanency planning

  • Eric C. Albers
  • Thom Reilly
  • Barbara Rittner
Articles

Abstract

This is a study of Children in Foster Care to determine possible factors affecting permanency planning. Several issues were determined to be of importance, cultural diversity, economics, and family support services. Areas needing additional study were determined to be the different treatment given to African-American and poor children, and the influence of economic and social problems on placement needs and planning.

Keywords

Social Psychology Social Problem Family Support Support Service Cultural Diversity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Public Welfare Association (APWA) (1991).National commission on child welfare and family preservation. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Benedict, M. I., & White, R. B. (1991). Factors associated with foster care length of stay.Child Welfare, 70(1): 45–58.Google Scholar
  3. Benedict, M. I., White, R. B., & Stallings, R. (1987). Race and length of stay in foster care.Social Work Research & Abstracts, (23): 23–26.Google Scholar
  4. Chestang, L. (1972). The dilemma of biracial adoption.Social Work, (17): 100–105.Google Scholar
  5. Child and Adolescent Service System Program: CASSP Technical Assistance Center; Cross, T. L. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care.Child Development Center: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Close, M. M. (1983). Child welfare and people of color: Denial of equal access.Social Work Research and Abstracts, 19(4), 13–20.Google Scholar
  7. DiLeonardi, J. W. (1980). Decision making in protective services.Child Welfare, 49(6), 358–364.Google Scholar
  8. English, D. (1990). Cultural issues related to assessment of child abuse and neglect.Fourth national roundtable of CPS risk assessment: Summary of highlights, Washington, D.C.: APWA.Google Scholar
  9. Family Welfare Research Group (1992). Pathways through child welfare services: Executive summary.Child Welfare Research Center: Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  10. Gil, O., & Jackson, B. (1983).Adoption and race. London: Billing & Son, Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Hansen, D. J.; Conaway, L. P.; & Christopher, J. S. (1990). Victims of child abuse. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hansen (Eds.),Treatment of family violence, New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, N. (1990). Dealing with diverse cultures in child welfare.Protecting Children 6–7.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchison, E. D. (1993). Mandatory reporting laws: Child protective case finding gone awry?Social Work, 38(1), 56–63.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins, S., Flanzraich, M., Gibson, J., Hendricks, J., & Marcshood N. (1983). Ethnic differential in foster care placementsSocial Work Research & Abstracts: 41–45.Google Scholar
  15. Kamerman, S.B. & Kahn, A.J. (1990). If CPS is driving child welfare — Where do we go from here?Public Welfare, 9–13.Google Scholar
  16. Lauder, E., Poulin, J. E., & Andrews, R. (1986). A study of 185 foster children 5 years after placement.Child Welfare, 55 (3): 241–251.Google Scholar
  17. Murphy, J.M., Jellinek, M., Quinn, D. Smith, G., Poitrast, F.G., & Goshko M. (1991). Substance abuse and serious child mistreatment: Prevalence, risk, and outcome in a court sample.Child Abuse and Neglect, 15, 197–211.Google Scholar
  18. National Association of Public Child Welfare Administrators (1988).Guidelines for a model system of protective services for abused and neglected children and their families. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. NASW News, (1984). Transracial adoption controversy grows.National Association of Social Worker: 3.Google Scholar
  20. Olsen, L. J. (1982). Predicting the permanency status of children in foster care.Social Work Research & Abstracts, (18): 9–20.Google Scholar
  21. Pearce, D. (1978). The feminization of poverty: Women, work, and welfare.Urban and Social Change Review, 11(1–2), 28–36.Google Scholar
  22. Pelton, L. H. (1989).For reasons of poverty: A critical analysis of public child welfare system in the United States. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenthal, J. A. (1988). Patterns of reported child abuse and neglect.Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 263–271.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenthal, J. A., Groze, V., & Curiel, H. (1990). Race, social class, and special needs adoptions.Social Work, 35(6), 532–539.Google Scholar
  25. Seaberg, J., & Tolley, E. (1986). Predictors of the length of stay in foster care.Social Work Research & Abstracts, (22): 11–17.Google Scholar
  26. Stuart, N., Rutman, L., & Jones, A. (1979). A macro-analysis of child care admissions.Child Welfare, 58(10), 642–649.Google Scholar
  27. Stehno, S. M. (1982). Differential treatment of minority children in service systems.Social Work, 27(1): 39–46.Google Scholar
  28. Tatara, T. (1992). Child substitute care population trends FY82 through FY 91-a summary: A statistical summary of the VCIS national child welfare data base.American Public Welfare Association: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. Testa, M. (1985).Using proportional hazards models to measure progress toward achieving permanence after foster placement. Prepared for the American Association of Public Welfare Information Systems Management Conference: Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  30. Wells, S. J., Stein, T. J., Fluke, J., & Downing, J. (1989). Screening in child protective services.Social Work, 34(1), 45–48.Google Scholar
  31. Well, S. J., Anderson, T. L., & Fluke, J. (1990). Screening and risk assessment in child protective services.Fourth national roundtable of CPS risk assessment: Summary of highlights. Washington, D.C.: APWA.Google Scholar
  32. Westat, Inc. (1978). National Study of social services to children and their families (DHEW Publication No. HDS 78-30150).U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric C. Albers
    • 1
  • Thom Reilly
    • 2
  • Barbara Rittner
    • 1
  1. 1.the School of Social WorkUniversity of NevadaReno
  2. 2.Nevada Division of Child and Family ServicesRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations